Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Blog - Wizards Like to Roll Dice Too
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 5816213" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>Either way works for me. One thing I'd like to see, though, is that many spells have an assumed effect and the die roll is just there to see if the target got lucky.</p><p></p><p>Take fireball, for example. Most players assume fireball does 10d6 damage, at 10th level. In practice, it doesn't. It does 5d6 damage to about half the targets, depending on circumstances. You can do some math to get an average of 7d6, or so. I like that the PCs get a chance to dodge the evil warlock's strike, but it shouldn't be as reliable as it is in 3e/4e. It's been a long time since I played 1/2e, but I recall the acrobat's "bite me" dodge as a pretty amazing and uncommon thing.</p><p></p><p>I don't want to take away the chance of avoiding damage (especially for save or die/suck effects) or even turn it into a long shot. I just don't want it to be the coin flip I've seen in my current 3e game. For that reason, I think I come down more on the side of having saves -- they're easier to stack in the wizard's favor.</p><p></p><p>Also, I find the wizard attacking a defense to be more aesthetically pleasing for single target attacks, but a bit of a misfit for area affect spells. Since things like charm, hold, and finger of death (SoD/S) are more likely to be targeted, maybe that's a good way to split it.</p><p></p><p>How does this sound? Keep the 4e defenses and use them against most targeted effects. Targeted effects would generally fall into one of two categories: 1) heavy-duty effects that tend to take an opponent out, but are expendable (Vancian); 2) level appropriate damaging effects that are not expendable (4E at-will/encounter and 3E reserve feats) and don't tick off the wizard player if they miss.</p><p></p><p>For area effect spells, like fireball, the spell and/or caster level sets a skill level, as per the musings in Legends and Lore (master, novice, et al.). Have skills analogous to classic saving throws. So, if the standard fireball creates a journeyman effect/hazard, the cleric who has neglected her reflex skill takes it in the face. The rogue has been maxing it and his mastery allows him to automatically halve the damage and roll to completely evade. Finally, the fighter has put a couple spare points into Reflex and, being a journeyman himself, has to roll a 15 or better to halve the damage.</p><p></p><p>If the skill system is appropriately balanced, it should be a real choice on whether to advance a save or another skill. I would also assume there will still be in-class and out-of-class skills.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 5816213, member: 5100"] Either way works for me. One thing I'd like to see, though, is that many spells have an assumed effect and the die roll is just there to see if the target got lucky. Take fireball, for example. Most players assume fireball does 10d6 damage, at 10th level. In practice, it doesn't. It does 5d6 damage to about half the targets, depending on circumstances. You can do some math to get an average of 7d6, or so. I like that the PCs get a chance to dodge the evil warlock's strike, but it shouldn't be as reliable as it is in 3e/4e. It's been a long time since I played 1/2e, but I recall the acrobat's "bite me" dodge as a pretty amazing and uncommon thing. I don't want to take away the chance of avoiding damage (especially for save or die/suck effects) or even turn it into a long shot. I just don't want it to be the coin flip I've seen in my current 3e game. For that reason, I think I come down more on the side of having saves -- they're easier to stack in the wizard's favor. Also, I find the wizard attacking a defense to be more aesthetically pleasing for single target attacks, but a bit of a misfit for area affect spells. Since things like charm, hold, and finger of death (SoD/S) are more likely to be targeted, maybe that's a good way to split it. How does this sound? Keep the 4e defenses and use them against most targeted effects. Targeted effects would generally fall into one of two categories: 1) heavy-duty effects that tend to take an opponent out, but are expendable (Vancian); 2) level appropriate damaging effects that are not expendable (4E at-will/encounter and 3E reserve feats) and don't tick off the wizard player if they miss. For area effect spells, like fireball, the spell and/or caster level sets a skill level, as per the musings in Legends and Lore (master, novice, et al.). Have skills analogous to classic saving throws. So, if the standard fireball creates a journeyman effect/hazard, the cleric who has neglected her reflex skill takes it in the face. The rogue has been maxing it and his mastery allows him to automatically halve the damage and roll to completely evade. Finally, the fighter has put a couple spare points into Reflex and, being a journeyman himself, has to roll a 15 or better to halve the damage. If the skill system is appropriately balanced, it should be a real choice on whether to advance a save or another skill. I would also assume there will still be in-class and out-of-class skills. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Blog - Wizards Like to Roll Dice Too
Top