Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Next Chat Transcript (Mike Mearls & Jeremy Crawford)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteveC" data-source="post: 5916676" data-attributes="member: 9053"><p>This made me laugh a bit. I'm going to playtest the ... heck ... out of this game, and I'm going to suggest D&D Next be exactly the kind of game I and my group wants. I have <strong>no interest</strong> in creating a game I don't want to play. At the same time, how much is WotC going to cater to our small but loud voices? Probably not much at all, but I'm still going to talk about it. And I know that many folks who want a different style of game are going to do the same thing.</p><p></p><p>I know you don't like 4E, so talking about how you want a return to earlier concepts is<strong> your job</strong> as part of this playtest, and the job of other people who feel the same way. If you don't do it, well, I'm going to say that WotC staff don't have the [psychic] keyword, so there's little chance that what you want will be heard.</p><p></p><p>It's WotC's job to take all the feedback they get, and synthesize it together to make the next edition. I think that strong and direct feedback about what a group wants or doesn't is how they do that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This explains the disagreement: paying taxes in no way gives you a right to complain (in my opinion, of course). Paying taxes but not voting or getting involved is the equivalent of taking no part in the playtest, then buying the books sight unseen and complaining that WotC didn't give you what you wanted and stole your money.</p><p></p><p>The bad restaurant? The bad movies? The bad government? The bad game? None of them change until you vote them out in different ways. When I was in college, we'd go to a diner at 2AM after finishing up gaming. One of the people in the group hated doing this, and complained about it all the time ... but only after we got there, and after we had ordered!</p><p></p><p>So I'll say it again: even if you don't like the same things as I do in D&D (and when I say "you" in this, it's the generic you of anyone reading this... ) get involved with the playtest and let WotC know what you want. I want the next edition to be successful, even if it turns out that it doesn't resemble something I like or will play at that point. Success of D&D is that important to gaming as a whole (all of this being my opinion, of course...).</p><p></p><p>And hey, I can even invoke one of my favorite quotes:</p><p></p><p>" We're told every day, 'You can't change the world.' But the world is changing every day. Only question is...who's doing it? You or somebody else?"</p><p>-J. Michael Straczynski</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteveC, post: 5916676, member: 9053"] This made me laugh a bit. I'm going to playtest the ... heck ... out of this game, and I'm going to suggest D&D Next be exactly the kind of game I and my group wants. I have [B]no interest[/B] in creating a game I don't want to play. At the same time, how much is WotC going to cater to our small but loud voices? Probably not much at all, but I'm still going to talk about it. And I know that many folks who want a different style of game are going to do the same thing. I know you don't like 4E, so talking about how you want a return to earlier concepts is[B] your job[/B] as part of this playtest, and the job of other people who feel the same way. If you don't do it, well, I'm going to say that WotC staff don't have the [psychic] keyword, so there's little chance that what you want will be heard. It's WotC's job to take all the feedback they get, and synthesize it together to make the next edition. I think that strong and direct feedback about what a group wants or doesn't is how they do that. This explains the disagreement: paying taxes in no way gives you a right to complain (in my opinion, of course). Paying taxes but not voting or getting involved is the equivalent of taking no part in the playtest, then buying the books sight unseen and complaining that WotC didn't give you what you wanted and stole your money. The bad restaurant? The bad movies? The bad government? The bad game? None of them change until you vote them out in different ways. When I was in college, we'd go to a diner at 2AM after finishing up gaming. One of the people in the group hated doing this, and complained about it all the time ... but only after we got there, and after we had ordered! So I'll say it again: even if you don't like the same things as I do in D&D (and when I say "you" in this, it's the generic you of anyone reading this... ) get involved with the playtest and let WotC know what you want. I want the next edition to be successful, even if it turns out that it doesn't resemble something I like or will play at that point. Success of D&D is that important to gaming as a whole (all of this being my opinion, of course...). And hey, I can even invoke one of my favorite quotes: " We're told every day, 'You can't change the world.' But the world is changing every day. Only question is...who's doing it? You or somebody else?" -J. Michael Straczynski [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Next Chat Transcript (Mike Mearls & Jeremy Crawford)
Top