Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="nedjer" data-source="post: 5875589" data-attributes="member: 83796">And once again the 4e false premise bursts into undeath. The how it is position: insufficient people bought 4e to support the development of a 5e forked from 4e.4e was, therefore, dead in the water in terms of future development - until it was saved by Next promising to cater for the 4e style of play. So, no WotC were never going to produce a 4.25e with a 5e label. And the people being attacking for taking Next forward are very much those protecting 4e interests across Next as a whole.Not so much biting the hand that feeds, as sticking the whole arm down your throat <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>