Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next info from PAX Prime + answering questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tuxgeo" data-source="post: 6010060" data-attributes="member: 61026"><p>Giving feedback about this would be a <em>very good idea</em>. The current playtest seems quite one-sided to me: most of the benefit humans get is in really strong ability score bonuses -- but humans don't get much else from their race.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps humans could get a choice of effects. This happened in 4E Essentials with the "Human Power Selection" innovation, where the original PHB's human racial feature of getting one "extra At-Will attack power at Level 1" was supplemented by an option to replace that racial feature with a per-Encounter +4 racial bonus to either an attack or a save. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps humans could give up a smidgen of their current +2 bonus to one ability score and +1 to each of the others, sort of like this: </p><p>"<strong>Two To One And One To Two</strong>:" One starting ability increases by +2 and two others increase by +1. </p><p></p><p>By removing those 3 <em>other</em> points of ability score bonuses, WotC could have design space to give human characters different optional benefits such as 4E's extra trained skill at Level 1, or 4E's extra feat at Level 1, or the above per-Encounter +4 racial bonus to an attack or a save. (Of course, Wizards would have to make sure that at least one such option, and ideally more than one, remained available to the Old-Schoolers who don't use skills or feats. . . .)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tuxgeo, post: 6010060, member: 61026"] Giving feedback about this would be a [I]very good idea[/I]. The current playtest seems quite one-sided to me: most of the benefit humans get is in really strong ability score bonuses -- but humans don't get much else from their race. Perhaps humans could get a choice of effects. This happened in 4E Essentials with the "Human Power Selection" innovation, where the original PHB's human racial feature of getting one "extra At-Will attack power at Level 1" was supplemented by an option to replace that racial feature with a per-Encounter +4 racial bonus to either an attack or a save. Perhaps humans could give up a smidgen of their current +2 bonus to one ability score and +1 to each of the others, sort of like this: "[B]Two To One And One To Two[/B]:" One starting ability increases by +2 and two others increase by +1. By removing those 3 [I]other[/I] points of ability score bonuses, WotC could have design space to give human characters different optional benefits such as 4E's extra trained skill at Level 1, or 4E's extra feat at Level 1, or the above per-Encounter +4 racial bonus to an attack or a save. (Of course, Wizards would have to make sure that at least one such option, and ideally more than one, remained available to the Old-Schoolers who don't use skills or feats. . . .) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next info from PAX Prime + answering questions
Top