Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A - 11/29/12
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6057142" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>It depends on which edition of D&D you are coming from. In the early days of D&D(1e/2e), the thief sucked at fighting, their backstab ability was nearly impossible to pull off, there were no social skills. The reason you chose thief was because they had Find and Remove Traps and Move Silently. There was no way to makes scrolls or wands of Knock, and Wizards has so few spell slots, they weren't going to "waste" them on knock.</p><p></p><p>Since that time, the Thief/Rogue has traditionally been "the guy who hides, sneaks, climbs, finds traps and removes them" as his role in the game. Even in early 3.0 before a lot of splat books came out, Rogues felt similar to the way they were in 2e. Other classes COULD take the skills, but none of them would be good at it, so it was best to let the Rogue handle them.</p><p></p><p>The real problem with the 3e/4e skill system is that it creates specialists. Having a skill isn't useful unless you are the BEST in your group at that skill.</p><p></p><p>If there is a social situation, does it make sense to allow the Rogue with a 12 Cha and maxed ranks in Diplomacy to do it? Or the Bard with the 20 Cha and max ranks in Diplomacy to do it? You'll ask the Bard to talk and the Rogue will keep his mouth shut to avoid failing the check. It's worse yet if the Rogue decided not to max social skills.</p><p></p><p>There is a "skill hierarchy" in those editions for each skill where each class is rated higher or lower. Basically, if your class uses the skills associated stat for combat in any way, you are higher on the skill hierarchy for that skill. Rogues are mid-high tier on most skills in the game. However, they are only at the highest tier for Dex based skills. Generally, that means that the only time they will be called upon to make their skill rolls are when they are Dex based(mostly picking locks and sneaking). Open Locks is one of the few skills that very few other classes also get as a class skill, so it's almost the only thing that you can count as a "Rogue exclusive".</p><p></p><p>So, the only times Rogues get to truly shine is when they gets to use that skill, most of the time. It kind of sucks. So much so that almost no one wanted to be a Rogue in any of our games. We replaced the Rogue with a Wizard with one level of Rogue so that he could max ranks in Rogue skills and find magical traps. Since Search and Disable Device were both Int based, the Wizard was better at those skills anyways and a couple of scrolls of Knock negated the need for Open Locks.</p><p></p><p>Virtually no consequences. By 9th level, most Wizards have 6 level 2 spell slots and more than enough money to acquire scrolls of knock for negligible cost in 3.5e. I kept at least one knock spell prepared every day as a Wizard, whether we had a Rogue or not. Why? You never know when you'd come across a lock that had too high a DC for the Rogue, or the Rogue would die part way through an adventure and you'd need to open a door. Or, the Rogue wouldn't show up for a session(and our DMs normally made them unable to help if they weren't there for a session).</p><p></p><p>By the time you are 9th level, 2nd level spells slots are nearly useless for combat. My Wizards that got this high normally had 90-100% of their level 2 slots available at the end of every day. "Wasting" a slot to open a door didn't seem like a waste at all. At least I felt like it was worthwhile to even HAVE level 2 spells.</p><p></p><p>Spell slots have the same problem in many areas of the game: If you don't run into situations that require you cast more spells than you currently have prepared, then spell slots aren't a limitation.</p><p></p><p>If I have 3 out of my 6 2nd level spell slots prepared as Knock spells and I only encounter 2 locked doors, then it cost me absolutely nothing to unlock those doors.</p><p></p><p>But a Wand of Knock has 50 charges, scrolls are cheap. If you prepare 2 Knocks a day and own 1 Wand of Knock, you are likely able to replace a Rogue for an entire campaign.</p><p></p><p>The ritual version is a totally different story, it's generally useless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6057142, member: 5143"] It depends on which edition of D&D you are coming from. In the early days of D&D(1e/2e), the thief sucked at fighting, their backstab ability was nearly impossible to pull off, there were no social skills. The reason you chose thief was because they had Find and Remove Traps and Move Silently. There was no way to makes scrolls or wands of Knock, and Wizards has so few spell slots, they weren't going to "waste" them on knock. Since that time, the Thief/Rogue has traditionally been "the guy who hides, sneaks, climbs, finds traps and removes them" as his role in the game. Even in early 3.0 before a lot of splat books came out, Rogues felt similar to the way they were in 2e. Other classes COULD take the skills, but none of them would be good at it, so it was best to let the Rogue handle them. The real problem with the 3e/4e skill system is that it creates specialists. Having a skill isn't useful unless you are the BEST in your group at that skill. If there is a social situation, does it make sense to allow the Rogue with a 12 Cha and maxed ranks in Diplomacy to do it? Or the Bard with the 20 Cha and max ranks in Diplomacy to do it? You'll ask the Bard to talk and the Rogue will keep his mouth shut to avoid failing the check. It's worse yet if the Rogue decided not to max social skills. There is a "skill hierarchy" in those editions for each skill where each class is rated higher or lower. Basically, if your class uses the skills associated stat for combat in any way, you are higher on the skill hierarchy for that skill. Rogues are mid-high tier on most skills in the game. However, they are only at the highest tier for Dex based skills. Generally, that means that the only time they will be called upon to make their skill rolls are when they are Dex based(mostly picking locks and sneaking). Open Locks is one of the few skills that very few other classes also get as a class skill, so it's almost the only thing that you can count as a "Rogue exclusive". So, the only times Rogues get to truly shine is when they gets to use that skill, most of the time. It kind of sucks. So much so that almost no one wanted to be a Rogue in any of our games. We replaced the Rogue with a Wizard with one level of Rogue so that he could max ranks in Rogue skills and find magical traps. Since Search and Disable Device were both Int based, the Wizard was better at those skills anyways and a couple of scrolls of Knock negated the need for Open Locks. Virtually no consequences. By 9th level, most Wizards have 6 level 2 spell slots and more than enough money to acquire scrolls of knock for negligible cost in 3.5e. I kept at least one knock spell prepared every day as a Wizard, whether we had a Rogue or not. Why? You never know when you'd come across a lock that had too high a DC for the Rogue, or the Rogue would die part way through an adventure and you'd need to open a door. Or, the Rogue wouldn't show up for a session(and our DMs normally made them unable to help if they weren't there for a session). By the time you are 9th level, 2nd level spells slots are nearly useless for combat. My Wizards that got this high normally had 90-100% of their level 2 slots available at the end of every day. "Wasting" a slot to open a door didn't seem like a waste at all. At least I felt like it was worthwhile to even HAVE level 2 spells. Spell slots have the same problem in many areas of the game: If you don't run into situations that require you cast more spells than you currently have prepared, then spell slots aren't a limitation. If I have 3 out of my 6 2nd level spell slots prepared as Knock spells and I only encounter 2 locked doors, then it cost me absolutely nothing to unlock those doors. But a Wand of Knock has 50 charges, scrolls are cheap. If you prepare 2 Knocks a day and own 1 Wand of Knock, you are likely able to replace a Rogue for an entire campaign. The ritual version is a totally different story, it's generally useless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A - 11/29/12
Top