Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A: Character Roleplaying Traits, XP as Reward & Inspiration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6162706" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>My main thought is that Inspiration is just like many other rules that have been added to the game over time...</p><p></p><p>...an easy-to-understand and mechanical way for less experienced RPG players to learn how to do things that many experienced players already do as a matter of instinct.</p><p></p><p>Thus, I am in favor of it.</p><p></p><p>What were Skill Challenges? They were a way for new DMs to learn how to create and advance a story using skill checks to determine whether or not the party succeeded in what they wanted to do. Experienced DMs already have a pretty good grasp on how to advance their stories through PC interaction, rolling checks as they felt necessary for dramatic tension or whatnot... and thus the formalized game system of "X successes before 3 failures" was seen as unnecessary for probably most of them.</p><p></p><p>But the Skill Challenge system wasn't designed for them. It was designed for those who needed to learn a framework that they did not yet already instinctually know.</p><p></p><p>Inspiration is the same thing. Less experienced players might wonder why they would intentionally create flaws for their characters, because that would make them less likely to succeed in their tasks. They perhaps haven't yet learned or experienced the fun that can be had by playing those flaws and not worrying about (or potentially even embracing) the pitfalls that come with these flaws. They are a self-creating encounter for each PC. You don't need the DM to put every encounter or situation in front of you... sometimes the most fun you can have is creating your own encounter for yourself by intentionally making a complication for yourself.</p><p></p><p>And a good way to inspire players to do that? Create complications for themselves (in the service of trying to play a three-dimensional character)? Give them a bennie to do it. So even though they are making things harder for their own PC... they get a little summin'-summin' for trying it out.</p><p></p><p>More experienced RPG players? They might already complicate their own PCs lives in the name of three-dimensionality, and don't want or need any "gifts" from the DM to get them to do it. Which is why it seems like it'll be entirely possible to remove the system with a minimum of difficulty.</p><p></p><p>But the real question here is this...</p><p></p><p>Should the game put it in as a default that can be removed... or put it in as a "module" that should be added?</p><p></p><p>And WotC's take on this I think is the right one: Less experienced or new RPG players will <em>tend</em> to play "by the book" because they won't yet know how or why to change the rules. As they say... you have to learn the rules before you can break them. So by including Inspiration as part of the default advanced game... we're more likely to see the system used by the very people for whom it was designed for. The new or less experienced players.</p><p></p><p>The experienced RPG player? It's already assumed they are going to take the rules and modify/modularize/redesign them to create the type of game they want to play. So asking them to take Inspiration out if they don't want it... is a much, much easier thing for them to do successfully, than it would be for new players to have to figure out how or why they would ADD said game system into their game.</p><p></p><p>And I think that's the right call. Make the default game the game you want to best help put the new players on solid ground-- learning all the tricks of the trade of advanced roleplaying techniques (both as a player and as a DM) that the rest of us all do out of instinct or take for granted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6162706, member: 7006"] My main thought is that Inspiration is just like many other rules that have been added to the game over time... ...an easy-to-understand and mechanical way for less experienced RPG players to learn how to do things that many experienced players already do as a matter of instinct. Thus, I am in favor of it. What were Skill Challenges? They were a way for new DMs to learn how to create and advance a story using skill checks to determine whether or not the party succeeded in what they wanted to do. Experienced DMs already have a pretty good grasp on how to advance their stories through PC interaction, rolling checks as they felt necessary for dramatic tension or whatnot... and thus the formalized game system of "X successes before 3 failures" was seen as unnecessary for probably most of them. But the Skill Challenge system wasn't designed for them. It was designed for those who needed to learn a framework that they did not yet already instinctually know. Inspiration is the same thing. Less experienced players might wonder why they would intentionally create flaws for their characters, because that would make them less likely to succeed in their tasks. They perhaps haven't yet learned or experienced the fun that can be had by playing those flaws and not worrying about (or potentially even embracing) the pitfalls that come with these flaws. They are a self-creating encounter for each PC. You don't need the DM to put every encounter or situation in front of you... sometimes the most fun you can have is creating your own encounter for yourself by intentionally making a complication for yourself. And a good way to inspire players to do that? Create complications for themselves (in the service of trying to play a three-dimensional character)? Give them a bennie to do it. So even though they are making things harder for their own PC... they get a little summin'-summin' for trying it out. More experienced RPG players? They might already complicate their own PCs lives in the name of three-dimensionality, and don't want or need any "gifts" from the DM to get them to do it. Which is why it seems like it'll be entirely possible to remove the system with a minimum of difficulty. But the real question here is this... Should the game put it in as a default that can be removed... or put it in as a "module" that should be added? And WotC's take on this I think is the right one: Less experienced or new RPG players will [I]tend[/I] to play "by the book" because they won't yet know how or why to change the rules. As they say... you have to learn the rules before you can break them. So by including Inspiration as part of the default advanced game... we're more likely to see the system used by the very people for whom it was designed for. The new or less experienced players. The experienced RPG player? It's already assumed they are going to take the rules and modify/modularize/redesign them to create the type of game they want to play. So asking them to take Inspiration out if they don't want it... is a much, much easier thing for them to do successfully, than it would be for new players to have to figure out how or why they would ADD said game system into their game. And I think that's the right call. Make the default game the game you want to best help put the new players on solid ground-- learning all the tricks of the trade of advanced roleplaying techniques (both as a player and as a DM) that the rest of us all do out of instinct or take for granted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A: Character Roleplaying Traits, XP as Reward & Inspiration
Top