Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 6178266" data-attributes="member: 17077">First off, what is so wrong with having more classes in the future? Why is subclass &quot;bloat&quot; okay but new classes something to be avoided like the plague?Second, you talk about the unchanging portion of classes and how in previous iterations of the game many classes shared a lot of stuff with previous classes. This may be true of some of them, but it was certainly never true of psions and warlocks (in comparison to wizards). They really didn't have much in common at all. They had totally different casting mechanics, radically different spell/power/invocation lists, etc. If you guys really feel you must put the wizard and sorcerer together, fine. I can stomach that. They were, after all, extremely similar, even sharing the same spell lists. But psions and warlocks? Hell no. Those should be separate classes from the mage. You already have 10 classes. What would be so terrible about having 12?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 6178266, member: 17077"] First off, what is so wrong with having more classes in the future? Why is subclass "bloat" okay but new classes something to be avoided like the plague? Second, you talk about the unchanging portion of classes and how in previous iterations of the game many classes shared a lot of stuff with previous classes. This may be true of some of them, but it was certainly never true of psions and warlocks (in comparison to wizards). They really didn't have much in common at all. They had totally different casting mechanics, radically different spell/power/invocation lists, etc. If you guys really feel you must put the wizard and sorcerer together, fine. I can stomach that. They were, after all, extremely similar, even sharing the same spell lists. But psions and warlocks? Hell no. Those should be separate classes from the mage. You already have 10 classes. What would be so terrible about having 12? [/QUOTE]

Verification