Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A: More Classes/Subclasses, Retraining & Playing Without Subclasses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6178462" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>IMO mechanics are only a minor part of that. Sure Rage is part of the Barbarian class, Ki is part of the Monk class, and spellcasting classes have their rules (albeit the same for all of them), but it's not the most important thing (and there might be multiclassing feats or other classes' subclasses granting similar mechanics). </p><p></p><p>It's really just archetypes at the end. People want to play a Wizard or a Barbarian or a Druid, although each has different expectations, a lot of them coming from fiction (books, movies, PC games...). Some classes might be going after a wider archetype, but the presence of narrow-archetype classes in the same game can manage to narrow e.g. the Fighter's archetype, in the sense that if you have a Paladin class then it tends to "absorb" the holy warrior concept, even tho nobody's forced to choose Paladin over Fighter.</p><p></p><p>My bottom line is, that while we D&D-nerds are here splitting hair over what is a Fighter <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> there are probably a lot of both casual and serious players who don't care about academic reasoning, and just <em>know</em> what a Fighter is in their mind, they pick up the Fighter class, and make it <em>work</em> as a whole, while we're thinking too much about why this detail here and there doesn't perfectly fit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that's only the case of the Mage class, which is almost empty if Wizardry is a selectable feature. But it's not the case for all other classes, the features from class are still more than the features from subclass. Even if you take classes where the subclass is huge e.g. 7-8 features, you still get at least as many level-based features from the class directly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6178462, member: 1465"] IMO mechanics are only a minor part of that. Sure Rage is part of the Barbarian class, Ki is part of the Monk class, and spellcasting classes have their rules (albeit the same for all of them), but it's not the most important thing (and there might be multiclassing feats or other classes' subclasses granting similar mechanics). It's really just archetypes at the end. People want to play a Wizard or a Barbarian or a Druid, although each has different expectations, a lot of them coming from fiction (books, movies, PC games...). Some classes might be going after a wider archetype, but the presence of narrow-archetype classes in the same game can manage to narrow e.g. the Fighter's archetype, in the sense that if you have a Paladin class then it tends to "absorb" the holy warrior concept, even tho nobody's forced to choose Paladin over Fighter. My bottom line is, that while we D&D-nerds are here splitting hair over what is a Fighter :) there are probably a lot of both casual and serious players who don't care about academic reasoning, and just [I]know[/I] what a Fighter is in their mind, they pick up the Fighter class, and make it [I]work[/I] as a whole, while we're thinking too much about why this detail here and there doesn't perfectly fit. I think that's only the case of the Mage class, which is almost empty if Wizardry is a selectable feature. But it's not the case for all other classes, the features from class are still more than the features from subclass. Even if you take classes where the subclass is huge e.g. 7-8 features, you still get at least as many level-based features from the class directly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Q&A: More Classes/Subclasses, Retraining & Playing Without Subclasses
Top