Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DreamChaser" data-source="post: 6218325" data-attributes="member: 1190">Skulky is not fluff. Warlocks in the past have had ways of remaining hidden and using that state to gain advantage. Unsavory in my description was intended to describe the in-game mechanics of poison, degradation, damage to the caster, and other objective negatives or subjective evils.Also, wizards are not debuff specialists. They have debuffs but they don't inherently focus on this. Clerics also have debuffs. Dealing damage and buffing/debuffing is inherent to spellcasting.From the limited information we have, I guess I just don't see enough to get worried. Also, I am seeing that we define class differently. I define it by theme while you state you define it by purpose. Do you then feel that barbarian and fighter should not be separate classes? Or does the lighter armor restriction of the barbarian make their purpose different enough for your definitions? (This is an honest question, not a sarcastic one...hard to tell here sometimes, I know.)</blockquote>