Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(D&D Next) - Seven Defensive Stats: Isn't that a bit too many?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaltab" data-source="post: 6319649" data-attributes="member: 6775806"><p>So, I notice that both the fighter and the cleric use the mechanic introduced during the playtest in which, aside from AC, defensive stats also include saving throws based on all six standard Ability Scores. Unfortuantely due to scheduling conflicts with my group I was never able to participate in a playtest game, so I haven't had the option to try these rules out in combat, but it does seem a bit... overkill?</p><p></p><p>AD&D and Basic both had 5 saving throws based on what you were saving against--and not the same five at that, and 3E reduced that to simply three saving throws based on the manner in which you saved: Fortitude, Will, and Reflex. As far as I can recall, this was a well-received change because it was less to keep track of. 4E used the same three terms but reversed them into static defenses akin to Armor Class, essentially making the D20 attack mechanic universal to all types of attacks.</p><p></p><p>Having six different saving throws not only reverses the mechanical progression over the past ~years, but seems like it also makes 'smart play' more difficult: with seven different defenses, you have to spend more resources plugging your weaknesses, especially those defenses based on a character's dump stats. So what about people's experiences in the playtest and preview material? Has this been a problem for anyone or does it work better than it sounds on e-paper?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaltab, post: 6319649, member: 6775806"] So, I notice that both the fighter and the cleric use the mechanic introduced during the playtest in which, aside from AC, defensive stats also include saving throws based on all six standard Ability Scores. Unfortuantely due to scheduling conflicts with my group I was never able to participate in a playtest game, so I haven't had the option to try these rules out in combat, but it does seem a bit... overkill? AD&D and Basic both had 5 saving throws based on what you were saving against--and not the same five at that, and 3E reduced that to simply three saving throws based on the manner in which you saved: Fortitude, Will, and Reflex. As far as I can recall, this was a well-received change because it was less to keep track of. 4E used the same three terms but reversed them into static defenses akin to Armor Class, essentially making the D20 attack mechanic universal to all types of attacks. Having six different saving throws not only reverses the mechanical progression over the past ~years, but seems like it also makes 'smart play' more difficult: with seven different defenses, you have to spend more resources plugging your weaknesses, especially those defenses based on a character's dump stats. So what about people's experiences in the playtest and preview material? Has this been a problem for anyone or does it work better than it sounds on e-paper? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
(D&D Next) - Seven Defensive Stats: Isn't that a bit too many?
Top