Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9432736" data-attributes="member: 6801228">...Why am I correcting you on not only the clarity, but the accuracy of DnD news? Is this a joke? One DnD was never the name of the ruleset. The link you provided states that explicitly. At worst you can say they were loose with the term, using it to refer to both the larger initiative and the rule changes, but they specifically kept calling it a code name. Code names are used consistently in product development to obscure the name of the product while it is in development. Claiming that they "walked back" the name of the rule set is a blatant lie, since One DnD was a codename. And yes, they both marketed their books as fixing the rules issues with the game, and as not being necessary, because people could keep using the old materials. Old materials, which include your own products. And despite you saying there is no clear branding to distinguish them [ATTACH=full]376252[/ATTACH]At the very least that is false on Amazon. Which will likely sell far more copies than the brick and mortar stores.</blockquote>