Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Player's Handbook 2024: The Official Advance Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9433707" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Maybe it would be better. I wasn't sitting on the graphic design team meeting. I don't know if, per chance, their legal contract with the artist prevented them from pasting a big red line with text in front of the art. I don't know if they had six different versions with different ribbons in each place, and in the end, decided that they thought each one made the product look worse and less appealing to customers. </p><p></p><p>But I also don't think they have made a mistake in NOT putting "2024 Revised Rules" on the front cover. There are so, so many ways for people to get that information, and the only time it will hurt a customer is if someone with no knowledge tries to buy the book, and decides to get the thinner, cheaper book. Or if someone buys the "wrong book" at a mixed book table... </p><p></p><p>And at the end of the day? There is a reason return policies and gift receipts exist.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>DO you know why people are confused? It isn't because of Wizards. It is because people keep getting online and fervently yelling that this is a new edition of the game, that it is completely incompatible, that they only said it wasn't so they didn't hurt their sales (And of course the sales of every single 3PP creator making 5e content). </p><p></p><p>IF people were not doing that? If we ONLY had Wizard's marketing and their statements instead of this storm of competing noise? No one would be confused.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just like this. "It feels like a new edition to me", "this reviewer said it was a new edition". Wizards of the Coast has been clear it is NOT a new edition, in the terminology that Wizards of the Coast has always used to denote a new Edition of the game. You want less confusion? Stop creating it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think any DM who forces their player to buy a $50 book instead of sharing their own copy is a pretty crappy friend and DM, unless that player has a history of destroying other people's property. That's why I tend to get two copies of a rulebook, to share at the table. I don't demand my players be responsible for buying the rules before I let them play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9433707, member: 6801228"] Maybe it would be better. I wasn't sitting on the graphic design team meeting. I don't know if, per chance, their legal contract with the artist prevented them from pasting a big red line with text in front of the art. I don't know if they had six different versions with different ribbons in each place, and in the end, decided that they thought each one made the product look worse and less appealing to customers. But I also don't think they have made a mistake in NOT putting "2024 Revised Rules" on the front cover. There are so, so many ways for people to get that information, and the only time it will hurt a customer is if someone with no knowledge tries to buy the book, and decides to get the thinner, cheaper book. Or if someone buys the "wrong book" at a mixed book table... And at the end of the day? There is a reason return policies and gift receipts exist. DO you know why people are confused? It isn't because of Wizards. It is because people keep getting online and fervently yelling that this is a new edition of the game, that it is completely incompatible, that they only said it wasn't so they didn't hurt their sales (And of course the sales of every single 3PP creator making 5e content). IF people were not doing that? If we ONLY had Wizard's marketing and their statements instead of this storm of competing noise? No one would be confused. Just like this. "It feels like a new edition to me", "this reviewer said it was a new edition". Wizards of the Coast has been clear it is NOT a new edition, in the terminology that Wizards of the Coast has always used to denote a new Edition of the game. You want less confusion? Stop creating it. I think any DM who forces their player to buy a $50 book instead of sharing their own copy is a pretty crappy friend and DM, unless that player has a history of destroying other people's property. That's why I tend to get two copies of a rulebook, to share at the table. I don't demand my players be responsible for buying the rules before I let them play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Player's Handbook 2024: The Official Advance Review
Top