Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Player's Handbook Video Redactions & Takedowns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 9428754" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>So there's a couple of different issues at play here.</p><p></p><p>Being a reviewer is a different job than previewing/promoting a book.</p><p></p><p>Supplying a copy of a book for review purposes is normal practice (also see movies, etc.) A publisher can't attach conditions to that review--can't say which pages can be shown, dictate any opinion, etc. However, the reviewer is bound by normal fair use practices relating to the <em>amount</em> they share. There's no strict rule on this, but you can't share a lot (though you can <em>talk about</em> what you want). An embargo date is the one thing that you do see from time to time, and while it's not enforceable, it's basically a strongly worded request. If you break an embargo, the only consequence is that you probably won't get any review copies in future.</p><p></p><p>That's reviews. A reviewer is in no way a 'partner'. Movie critics aren't partners of the studios, even if they attend press screenings. Publishers supplying review copies is just part of their job, reviewers reviewing things is just part of their job, everybody's just doing their job, and it's generally well understood.</p><p></p><p>If you're sending a book to somebody for purely promotional purposes, and especially if you're attaching NDAs (excepting embargoes), restricting what can be shown or talked about, etc., that's not a reviewer relationship. That <em>is</em> a promotional partnership. In this case, 'fair use' isn't the issue--it's whatever has been agreed between the two parties. This appears to be what we're discussing here, and it seems that (a) the relationship wasn't clear and (b) initial guidelines on what was appropriate were also absent or not clear. However, the existence of those guidelines does put this situation in the promotional partner category, not the review category.</p><p></p><p>All perfectly valid, but we are talking about two different things.</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, we will have a review up this week as one of our reviewers was able to secure a copy of the book at Gen Con.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 9428754, member: 1"] So there's a couple of different issues at play here. Being a reviewer is a different job than previewing/promoting a book. Supplying a copy of a book for review purposes is normal practice (also see movies, etc.) A publisher can't attach conditions to that review--can't say which pages can be shown, dictate any opinion, etc. However, the reviewer is bound by normal fair use practices relating to the [I]amount[/I] they share. There's no strict rule on this, but you can't share a lot (though you can [I]talk about[/I] what you want). An embargo date is the one thing that you do see from time to time, and while it's not enforceable, it's basically a strongly worded request. If you break an embargo, the only consequence is that you probably won't get any review copies in future. That's reviews. A reviewer is in no way a 'partner'. Movie critics aren't partners of the studios, even if they attend press screenings. Publishers supplying review copies is just part of their job, reviewers reviewing things is just part of their job, everybody's just doing their job, and it's generally well understood. If you're sending a book to somebody for purely promotional purposes, and especially if you're attaching NDAs (excepting embargoes), restricting what can be shown or talked about, etc., that's not a reviewer relationship. That [I]is[/I] a promotional partnership. In this case, 'fair use' isn't the issue--it's whatever has been agreed between the two parties. This appears to be what we're discussing here, and it seems that (a) the relationship wasn't clear and (b) initial guidelines on what was appropriate were also absent or not clear. However, the existence of those guidelines does put this situation in the promotional partner category, not the review category. All perfectly valid, but we are talking about two different things. Incidentally, we will have a review up this week as one of our reviewers was able to secure a copy of the book at Gen Con. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Player's Handbook Video Redactions & Takedowns
Top