Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D playtest feed back report, UA8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9254634" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I don't agree. But more importantly, has anyone at WOTC said or even implied anything like that being the motivation, or are you just speculating about their motives because you don't like some choices WOTC made that they claimed were based on the playtest process?</p><p></p><p>[Edit - just decided to look back on the "Do they read the surveys" controversy and there are direct statements from FIVE different WOTC employees past and present who declare in no uncertain terms they read all surveys, there are three full time people doing it and several other higher ups who do it as part of their job, they do make changes based on survey responses, and they run the entire design schedule and plan based on when survey feedback comes in and what that feedback looks like. All five different people, to varying degrees, make it super clear the intent of the playtest and surveys is to gather feedback they can use to alter their path, and they do not mention even impliedly or in the briefest sense a motive to avoid criticism behind them. So that's the context you're facing - your allegation is, in essence, saying all these people are lying, even the ones who were fired and no longer representing the companies interests who said that's how that system operates.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9254634, member: 2525"] I don't agree. But more importantly, has anyone at WOTC said or even implied anything like that being the motivation, or are you just speculating about their motives because you don't like some choices WOTC made that they claimed were based on the playtest process? [Edit - just decided to look back on the "Do they read the surveys" controversy and there are direct statements from FIVE different WOTC employees past and present who declare in no uncertain terms they read all surveys, there are three full time people doing it and several other higher ups who do it as part of their job, they do make changes based on survey responses, and they run the entire design schedule and plan based on when survey feedback comes in and what that feedback looks like. All five different people, to varying degrees, make it super clear the intent of the playtest and surveys is to gather feedback they can use to alter their path, and they do not mention even impliedly or in the briefest sense a motive to avoid criticism behind them. So that's the context you're facing - your allegation is, in essence, saying all these people are lying, even the ones who were fired and no longer representing the companies interests who said that's how that system operates.] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D playtest feed back report, UA8
Top