Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 6098783" data-attributes="member: 54877">I'd love for them to get serious about folding things like the warlord back into the fighter.&nbsp; That would mean they'd get serious about providing some options not buried into the class structure to give more breadth.&nbsp; Then that would mean they'd get serious about removing most other classes, including barbarian, paladin, etc.&nbsp; Stick to the main 4--or perhaps the main 4 with a few carefully chosen classes to represent the intersections that are not done well via multi-classing--or keep a few more to represent the intersections and ditch multi-classing altogether.&nbsp; I don't have much of a preference for the exact route chosen, but I would like some consistency.&nbsp; Take the inconsistent traditions out behind the barn and stick a sharp knife into them.&nbsp; Insisting that we get fighter, cleric, rogue, ranger, and paladin--and then not exploring other archetypes--means that crap mechanics get shoehorned into the whole system to make that sort of work out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 6098783, member: 54877"] I'd love for them to get serious about folding things like the warlord back into the fighter. That would mean they'd get serious about providing some options not buried into the class structure to give more breadth. Then that would mean they'd get serious about removing most other classes, including barbarian, paladin, etc. Stick to the main 4--or perhaps the main 4 with a few carefully chosen classes to represent the intersections that are [B]not [/B]done well via multi-classing--or keep a few more to represent the intersections and ditch multi-classing altogether. I don't have much of a preference for the exact route chosen, but I would like some consistency. Take the inconsistent traditions out behind the barn and stick a sharp knife into them. Insisting that we get fighter, cleric, rogue, ranger, and paladin--and then not exploring other archetypes--means that crap mechanics get shoehorned into the whole system to make that sort of work out. [/QUOTE]

Verification