Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 6099240" data-attributes="member: 98255">Sorry, that doesn't cut it for me; that's ramming a square peg into a round hole. And thanks for the condescending tone, I appreciate it. It will really help sell me on your position.I realize you've spent a lot of words explaining your position, and why it works for you, but it doesn't make your view any more "correct." It doesn't work for me. I disagree with it. I don't think Fighter is the best chassis to necessarily carry the Warlord concept. In my opinion, it has less in common with the Fighter than Paladin, Ranger, Barbarian or to a lesser extent even Monk or Rogue do.I'm not trying to convince you here, as I'm quite sure you don't care and have a firmly cemented opinion in any case. Going by your blog posts here, I often disagree with your approach, and that's fine. There are lots of options out there to keep us both happy. This is one of the "great deciders" for whether or not Next will contain options that keep both of us happy.To that end, I submit that you will likely still be happy with Next, even if Warlord gets to be its own class, even if it's not your preference of how they handle it, whereas I will not be happy with 5e if the Warlord doesn't get to be its own class. That's just how I see it. Either way, it doesn't matter much to me, since I can keep playing what I like with 4th, but it may matter to WotC, in that it's another thing keeping me from buying into their so-called "big tent" that is Next</blockquote>

Verification