Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D podcast!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 6099240" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>Sorry, that doesn't cut it for me; that's ramming a square peg into a round hole. And thanks for the condescending tone, I appreciate it. It will really help sell me on your position.</p><p></p><p>I realize you've spent a lot of words explaining your position, and why it works for you, but it doesn't make your view any more "correct." It doesn't work for me. I disagree with it. I don't think Fighter is the best chassis to necessarily carry the Warlord concept. In my opinion, it has less in common with the Fighter than Paladin, Ranger, Barbarian or to a lesser extent even Monk or Rogue do.</p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to convince you here, as I'm quite sure you don't care and have a firmly cemented opinion in any case. Going by your blog posts here, I <strong><em>often</em></strong> disagree with your approach, and that's fine. There are lots of options out there to keep us both happy. This is one of the "great deciders" for whether or not Next will contain options that keep both of us happy.</p><p></p><p>To that end, I submit that you will likely still be happy with Next, even if Warlord gets to be its own class, even if it's not your preference of how they handle it, whereas I will <em>not</em> be happy with 5e if the Warlord doesn't get to be its own class. That's just how I see it. Either way, it doesn't matter much to me, since I can keep playing what I like with 4th, but it may matter to WotC, in that it's another thing keeping me from buying into their so-called "big tent" that is Next</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 6099240, member: 98255"] Sorry, that doesn't cut it for me; that's ramming a square peg into a round hole. And thanks for the condescending tone, I appreciate it. It will really help sell me on your position. I realize you've spent a lot of words explaining your position, and why it works for you, but it doesn't make your view any more "correct." It doesn't work for me. I disagree with it. I don't think Fighter is the best chassis to necessarily carry the Warlord concept. In my opinion, it has less in common with the Fighter than Paladin, Ranger, Barbarian or to a lesser extent even Monk or Rogue do. I'm not trying to convince you here, as I'm quite sure you don't care and have a firmly cemented opinion in any case. Going by your blog posts here, I [B][I]often[/I][/B] disagree with your approach, and that's fine. There are lots of options out there to keep us both happy. This is one of the "great deciders" for whether or not Next will contain options that keep both of us happy. To that end, I submit that you will likely still be happy with Next, even if Warlord gets to be its own class, even if it's not your preference of how they handle it, whereas I will [I]not[/I] be happy with 5e if the Warlord doesn't get to be its own class. That's just how I see it. Either way, it doesn't matter much to me, since I can keep playing what I like with 4th, but it may matter to WotC, in that it's another thing keeping me from buying into their so-called "big tent" that is Next [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D podcast!
Top