Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Political Systems
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Grumpy Celt" data-source="post: 2885854" data-attributes="member: 1019"><p>There are three issues (<strong>A</strong>, <strong>B</strong> and <strong>C</strong> below) with this discussion thread rendering it useless and one problem (<strong>D</strong> below) rendering it a rules violation.</p><p></p><p><strong>A.</strong> The majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are ignoring – either through ignorance or deliberately – the fact that rules for governing have already been presented, both by <em>WotC</em> and by second party publishers. </p><p></p><p>This includes, but is not necessarily limited to; <em>Empire, Fields of Blood</em> and <em>Power of Faerun.</em> </p><p></p><p>However, majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are blithely ignoring these rules and chattering endless with time-wasting, space taking clap-trap as though the rules did not and do not exist.</p><p></p><p><strong>B.</strong> The majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are sloppily using terms that actually have specific definitions. If the people involved are not agree on what, for example, the term monarchy despotism means (and further they refuse to acknowledge that they are not agree on the definition of the term) then they are simply talking past each other, in which case the discussion automatically becomes a narcissistic masturbatory waste of time.</p><p></p><p><strong>C.</strong> As a strictly fictional construct from beginning to end, the only government’s that will ever work will be whatever ones the writer and/or DM dreams up as a manifestation of their personal despotic fantasies. Any other considerations are at best incidental and at worst offer the writer and/or DM sport in the chance to stomp on people who have the temerity to disagree with them.</p><p></p><p><strong>D.</strong> The rules of this board strictly forbid political discussions. This thread should not have been started, let alone allowed to continue.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">And everyone knows King Uber-Knickers the 3rd was a half-wit, but his son Fancy Pants was a real go-get 'um tyrant...</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Grumpy Celt, post: 2885854, member: 1019"] There are three issues ([b]A[/b], [b]B[/b] and [b]C[/b] below) with this discussion thread rendering it useless and one problem ([b]D[/b] below) rendering it a rules violation. [b]A.[/b] The majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are ignoring – either through ignorance or deliberately – the fact that rules for governing have already been presented, both by [i]WotC[/i] and by second party publishers. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to; [i]Empire, Fields of Blood[/i] and [i]Power of Faerun.[/i] However, majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are blithely ignoring these rules and chattering endless with time-wasting, space taking clap-trap as though the rules did not and do not exist. [b]B.[/b] The majority of the people involved in this “discussion” are sloppily using terms that actually have specific definitions. If the people involved are not agree on what, for example, the term monarchy despotism means (and further they refuse to acknowledge that they are not agree on the definition of the term) then they are simply talking past each other, in which case the discussion automatically becomes a narcissistic masturbatory waste of time. [b]C.[/b] As a strictly fictional construct from beginning to end, the only government’s that will ever work will be whatever ones the writer and/or DM dreams up as a manifestation of their personal despotic fantasies. Any other considerations are at best incidental and at worst offer the writer and/or DM sport in the chance to stomp on people who have the temerity to disagree with them. [b]D.[/b] The rules of this board strictly forbid political discussions. This thread should not have been started, let alone allowed to continue. [size=1]And everyone knows King Uber-Knickers the 3rd was a half-wit, but his son Fancy Pants was a real go-get 'um tyrant...[/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Political Systems
Top