Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
D&D Race You Hate the Most
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5840460" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>No, it's more like I want D&D games to be plausible.</p><p></p><p>It's not plausible when monsters roam city streets as if they are normal civilians. As a player, I don't want to play D&D campaign like Star Wars where there is a plethora of hundreds of different races of humanoid aliens in the majority of cities, most of whom get along for the most part shy of the worst parts of the cities.</p><p></p><p>Instead, I prefer a D&D where most "monsters" are evil and where there are few social consequences for taking them out. Monsters should be outlaws and races that are not monstrous should be known acceptable members of a given fantasy campaign setting. There should be a reason in D&D campaigns that monsters are called monsters.</p><p></p><p>And successful monster knowledge checks should let players know of creatures that are "not generally considered evil or monstrous".</p><p></p><p>Granted, every campaign will be different, but I prefer logical settings to illogical ones. For example, even in the city of Sigil, monsters walk the street and do not molest each only because of a logical reason. The Lady of Pain will throw them in a maze if they do not. They are forced to behave. Monsters in more traditional non-Sigil like areas (like the majority of areas in many campaign settings) should typically have other racial enemies (including PC races) and should typically be malevolent, not benevolent. They shouldn't be forced to behave and laws shouldn't protect them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Note: I have no problem with monsters being in cities if they are hidden or disguised, I just have a problem with the concept of live and let live; Trolls and Humans working side by side in a city. That to me is not D&D. It's Star Wars. It's the wrong genre.</p><p></p><p>Eberron introduced a lot of this with "laws of Sharn that protect all humanoid races" and it's just lame. IMO. Meh. Sharn is too 20th century sensibilities for my tastes. As for my posts in this thread, this thread is about races that people hate. I hate monstrous PC races.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5840460, member: 2011"] No, it's more like I want D&D games to be plausible. It's not plausible when monsters roam city streets as if they are normal civilians. As a player, I don't want to play D&D campaign like Star Wars where there is a plethora of hundreds of different races of humanoid aliens in the majority of cities, most of whom get along for the most part shy of the worst parts of the cities. Instead, I prefer a D&D where most "monsters" are evil and where there are few social consequences for taking them out. Monsters should be outlaws and races that are not monstrous should be known acceptable members of a given fantasy campaign setting. There should be a reason in D&D campaigns that monsters are called monsters. And successful monster knowledge checks should let players know of creatures that are "not generally considered evil or monstrous". Granted, every campaign will be different, but I prefer logical settings to illogical ones. For example, even in the city of Sigil, monsters walk the street and do not molest each only because of a logical reason. The Lady of Pain will throw them in a maze if they do not. They are forced to behave. Monsters in more traditional non-Sigil like areas (like the majority of areas in many campaign settings) should typically have other racial enemies (including PC races) and should typically be malevolent, not benevolent. They shouldn't be forced to behave and laws shouldn't protect them. Note: I have no problem with monsters being in cities if they are hidden or disguised, I just have a problem with the concept of live and let live; Trolls and Humans working side by side in a city. That to me is not D&D. It's Star Wars. It's the wrong genre. Eberron introduced a lot of this with "laws of Sharn that protect all humanoid races" and it's just lame. IMO. Meh. Sharn is too 20th century sensibilities for my tastes. As for my posts in this thread, this thread is about races that people hate. I hate monstrous PC races. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
D&D Race You Hate the Most
Top