Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 9341174" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>Agree 100%, but nostalgia is a hell of a drug.</p><p></p><p>I also can't prove the intent of Wizkids, but I feel pretty confident that they did this to generate buzz and they were very successful. I don't get why folks keep saying this is cynical. Maybe there were other characters and artwork to introduce a bulked up female warrior for the 50th anniversary, but the Red Box cover is one of the most well known pieces of D&D art and was one where the character was only shown from the back. What other piece of art could they have used to as successfully subvert expectations and create as much buzz with?</p><p></p><p></p><p>The female art is definitely targeted to appeal to heterosexual guys, just like the covers of pulp adventure fiction. The male figures are also targeted as men as aspirational. The target audience was guys.</p><p></p><p>Nothing nefarious about it. Whether it was good for society (lots of conservative types decried it as trashy, and many women's group decried it as exploitative at that time) or exclusive (probably not trying to exclude, they are just making assumptions of who their target audience was and probably had numbers to back it up), it was definitely capitalizing on the male gaze and did so successfully. I appreciated it then and I appreciate it now. But I can also see why people might have other preferences. It is not as if straight guys have less access to depictions of beautiful women in revealing garb and suggestive poses in 2024 than they did in 1984. </p><p></p><p>You can't always get what you want. There have been minis of the D&D cartoon characters, minis of iconic D&D monsters from the OD&D and AD&D era, there is a mini of the Paladin in Hell art, and probably more that I forgot about. But Wiz Kids makes ONE mini that doesn't fit some folk's expectations and they throw a tantrum.</p><p></p><p>Like I did with my kids when they threw tantrums at stupid things, best to ignore them.</p><p></p><p>This isn't a Bud Light or Harry's Razor situation. Those upset enough over this are likely a very small minority of the potential consumers. They may be very vocal, but that will likely just be free advertising that will drive up sales of this miniature.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 9341174, member: 6796661"] Agree 100%, but nostalgia is a hell of a drug. I also can't prove the intent of Wizkids, but I feel pretty confident that they did this to generate buzz and they were very successful. I don't get why folks keep saying this is cynical. Maybe there were other characters and artwork to introduce a bulked up female warrior for the 50th anniversary, but the Red Box cover is one of the most well known pieces of D&D art and was one where the character was only shown from the back. What other piece of art could they have used to as successfully subvert expectations and create as much buzz with? The female art is definitely targeted to appeal to heterosexual guys, just like the covers of pulp adventure fiction. The male figures are also targeted as men as aspirational. The target audience was guys. Nothing nefarious about it. Whether it was good for society (lots of conservative types decried it as trashy, and many women's group decried it as exploitative at that time) or exclusive (probably not trying to exclude, they are just making assumptions of who their target audience was and probably had numbers to back it up), it was definitely capitalizing on the male gaze and did so successfully. I appreciated it then and I appreciate it now. But I can also see why people might have other preferences. It is not as if straight guys have less access to depictions of beautiful women in revealing garb and suggestive poses in 2024 than they did in 1984. You can't always get what you want. There have been minis of the D&D cartoon characters, minis of iconic D&D monsters from the OD&D and AD&D era, there is a mini of the Paladin in Hell art, and probably more that I forgot about. But Wiz Kids makes ONE mini that doesn't fit some folk's expectations and they throw a tantrum. Like I did with my kids when they threw tantrums at stupid things, best to ignore them. This isn't a Bud Light or Harry's Razor situation. Those upset enough over this are likely a very small minority of the potential consumers. They may be very vocal, but that will likely just be free advertising that will drive up sales of this miniature. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?
Top