Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Autumnal" data-source="post: 9341813" data-attributes="member: 6671663"><p>Someone mentioned doing a lot of work for hire, many pages ago, and not agreeing with the idea that Elmore ought to be allowed an authoritative say. I agree with that, having done a lot of work for hire, some of which changed work of my predecessors and some of which has been changed in small ways and big ones by my successors.</p><p></p><p>Some thoughts:</p><p></p><p>I find it stress reducing to treat each edition as its own continuum. Changed mechanics, which seem to be the most reliable marker of edition change in most RPGs (not all, just most), offer a good opportunity for setting tweaks. There may be spelled out to the public or might not. Even when new setting stuff generally aligns pretty closely with what’s come before, not assuming it’s all the same makes things more relaxed all around.</p><p></p><p>Work-for-hire creators should have a strong sense of head-canon versus official decisions. A fair number of pro fiction writers have done fanfic in settings and with characters they created. In the Storyteller's Vault on DriveThru, you can find fan supplements by people who had been working on cancelled lines, doing work they might have done if the lines had continued. And so on. But it’s important to preserve the awareness of what’s official and what isn’t.</p><p></p><p>I can tell you what I would have preferred to happen in cases where I don’t like how things went. But I am not entitled to say that it should have or ought to have gone my way. That’s not how work for hire goes. When we turn in our work and get paid for it, our <em>authority</em> over the work is done. And this is true for Elmore’s art work, too.</p><p></p><p>By my preferences, then, no version of figures now can retroactively changed what’s come before. And the public can decide for themselves whether we’re looking at different renderings of the same person all along or not, for our various head-canons. Elmore can say what his intentions were and WotC can say what’s official at the moment, and neither of those is authoritative unless we’re asking about his intentions or their policy of the moment.</p><p></p><p>This may seem hair-splitting, but it’s not. Keeping these distinctions clear is <em>very</em> important for reducing stress and unnecessary conflict.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Autumnal, post: 9341813, member: 6671663"] Someone mentioned doing a lot of work for hire, many pages ago, and not agreeing with the idea that Elmore ought to be allowed an authoritative say. I agree with that, having done a lot of work for hire, some of which changed work of my predecessors and some of which has been changed in small ways and big ones by my successors. Some thoughts: I find it stress reducing to treat each edition as its own continuum. Changed mechanics, which seem to be the most reliable marker of edition change in most RPGs (not all, just most), offer a good opportunity for setting tweaks. There may be spelled out to the public or might not. Even when new setting stuff generally aligns pretty closely with what’s come before, not assuming it’s all the same makes things more relaxed all around. Work-for-hire creators should have a strong sense of head-canon versus official decisions. A fair number of pro fiction writers have done fanfic in settings and with characters they created. In the Storyteller's Vault on DriveThru, you can find fan supplements by people who had been working on cancelled lines, doing work they might have done if the lines had continued. And so on. But it’s important to preserve the awareness of what’s official and what isn’t. I can tell you what I would have preferred to happen in cases where I don’t like how things went. But I am not entitled to say that it should have or ought to have gone my way. That’s not how work for hire goes. When we turn in our work and get paid for it, our [I]authority[/I] over the work is done. And this is true for Elmore’s art work, too. By my preferences, then, no version of figures now can retroactively changed what’s come before. And the public can decide for themselves whether we’re looking at different renderings of the same person all along or not, for our various head-canons. Elmore can say what his intentions were and WotC can say what’s official at the moment, and neither of those is authoritative unless we’re asking about his intentions or their policy of the moment. This may seem hair-splitting, but it’s not. Keeping these distinctions clear is [I]very[/I] important for reducing stress and unnecessary conflict. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?
Top