Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alnag" data-source="post: 3445241" data-attributes="member: 10087">Currently in D&D yes. But do they have to be? Especially with the talent trees? I used the names of the classes not because I like them in DnD 3e (especially not the monk) but because I didn't have the better name.Look into the D20 modern for 6 character concept - for each ability. It give sense. And you can rename them as you wish.Good and also tough question. I would say, why D&D has currently 11 classes and not these four? Because if average party has 4 players + DM there are no niche for newcomers. For I know the groups with 7 players and it could be pretty rough if there would be like two warriors, two experts two mages and priest. Even with six characters there would be one nich overcrowded, but not in so many cases.Also if you base the talent trees on those of SW SAGA you will have what you need for both Bard (noble talent trees) and Monk (scout talent trees). But I am just offering my opinion, I do not want to press it in anyway.</blockquote>