Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Settings with No Problematic Areas?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shardstone" data-source="post: 8033196" data-attributes="member: 6807784"><p>9/10 times, a problematic issue in a piece of fiction can be fixed by simply fleshing out the issue.</p><p></p><p>Flesh out the drow to be something other than 1-dimensional cheesy villains.</p><p></p><p>Flesh out the orcs to be more than 1-dimensional savages.</p><p></p><p>So on and so forth.</p><p></p><p>People talk about how its great to have good & evil, but having good & evil is a totally separate conversation that has nothing to do with this.</p><p></p><p>Don't forget that Tolkien's orcs were redeemable in Tolkien's mind and were not just 1-dimensional monsters but instead an engineered race who, again according to Tolkien, could potentially find redemption in life. They had cultures, and though they were twisted, they were twisted by a higher power and had the potential to find a way out of that darker power.</p><p></p><p>So yes, you can have good & evil. No need to walk on eggshells. Instead, stop half-assing your fantasy, put some thought into what you're doing, and stop getting insulted because you aren't being censored, you're just being told to put more effort in. </p><p></p><p>Back in the 70s/80s when most of you guys were getting into D&D, all of this stuff was new; the baseline WAS the effort. Now its 2020. We've seen the baseline and decided its for the best for both the culture & the game if people put in more effort into their Fantasy worlds.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't mean the villain has to be redeemed. Spoiler: the orcs almost entirely were wiped out. Its ok to have bad guys lose. Its ok to have bad guys that won't be redeemed at all. And yes, its even ok to have something be evil for the sake of being evil, but you have to show people why your villain is like that. Is it because the pleasures of evil outweigh the pains of being good? Is it because a traumatic past? Is it because of a higher power twisting you into darkness? So on and so forth.</p><p></p><p>Just try a little harder. That's what society is asking for. Nothing more, nothing less.</p><p></p><p>And, also, if you do not want to try harder, that's ok too! You don't have too. KNow why? You can make your OWN art and run your OWN games and do WHATEVER It is that you want. DON'T try harder if you don't want too. But for Buddha's sake, don't go online and start complaining about how people are asking for more of you. That's what teenagers do in High School when they're given homework. We're better than that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shardstone, post: 8033196, member: 6807784"] 9/10 times, a problematic issue in a piece of fiction can be fixed by simply fleshing out the issue. Flesh out the drow to be something other than 1-dimensional cheesy villains. Flesh out the orcs to be more than 1-dimensional savages. So on and so forth. People talk about how its great to have good & evil, but having good & evil is a totally separate conversation that has nothing to do with this. Don't forget that Tolkien's orcs were redeemable in Tolkien's mind and were not just 1-dimensional monsters but instead an engineered race who, again according to Tolkien, could potentially find redemption in life. They had cultures, and though they were twisted, they were twisted by a higher power and had the potential to find a way out of that darker power. So yes, you can have good & evil. No need to walk on eggshells. Instead, stop half-assing your fantasy, put some thought into what you're doing, and stop getting insulted because you aren't being censored, you're just being told to put more effort in. Back in the 70s/80s when most of you guys were getting into D&D, all of this stuff was new; the baseline WAS the effort. Now its 2020. We've seen the baseline and decided its for the best for both the culture & the game if people put in more effort into their Fantasy worlds. This doesn't mean the villain has to be redeemed. Spoiler: the orcs almost entirely were wiped out. Its ok to have bad guys lose. Its ok to have bad guys that won't be redeemed at all. And yes, its even ok to have something be evil for the sake of being evil, but you have to show people why your villain is like that. Is it because the pleasures of evil outweigh the pains of being good? Is it because a traumatic past? Is it because of a higher power twisting you into darkness? So on and so forth. Just try a little harder. That's what society is asking for. Nothing more, nothing less. And, also, if you do not want to try harder, that's ok too! You don't have too. KNow why? You can make your OWN art and run your OWN games and do WHATEVER It is that you want. DON'T try harder if you don't want too. But for Buddha's sake, don't go online and start complaining about how people are asking for more of you. That's what teenagers do in High School when they're given homework. We're better than that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Settings with No Problematic Areas?
Top