Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D species article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 9410500" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>And I'm not sure why you think that it's bizarre. I think one of my players reached sixteen pages of background.</p><p></p><p>That <em>was</em> an 18 year old. How old do you think someone needed to be to be a squire? Or a monk in the middle ages? (14 in both cases generally). We're not all the sons of nobles - but most of us have a past and do multiple things.</p><p></p><p>This is because to me it looks as if you are reaching and contorting to try desperately to find some sort of moral claim rather than just admitting to disliking the mechanics. But as you keep bringing it up (despite the politics) <em>there would be classism if the stats weren't spread around. </em>Is there anything saying all nobles are smart? No. Is there anything saying that people from the streets can't be smart? Not that I'm aware of. Is there something <em>in the real world</em> saying that sons of the wealthy get better teachers leading to better book learning and better grades? Yes. (Do I need to dig up university entrance stats?)</p><p></p><p>The closest to classism here is that there is an acknowledgement that your background shapes your opportunities. And that nobles tend to be better fed and those who care about it (not all do, hence not hard coding stats) tend to have better opportunities to learn academic things. And I'd say that the only way to deny this is to claim that everyone actually does have equality of opportunity and it is the fault of poor people that they are poor. And <em>that</em> is classist.</p><p></p><p>The only secondary stats that are a near total waste for any characters are Cha and Int. Wis might be in third place but legitimately has about a quarter of all saving throws, two passive skills, and a good skill range.</p><p></p><p>I'd say the only skill that truly matters here is Perception. And if they have done what I <em>think</em> then the Str/Dex/Con background will be the one that goes with the Medium Armour + Shield proficiency (at least it won't offer Int or Cha), making it an interesting choice for arcane casters - and the Int/Wis/Cha one with Magic Initiate that can spruce up fighters.</p><p></p><p>I don't think there will be 4-6 backgrounds; I think it's more likely there will be about four for each class. And four or five backgrounds just dropped in the trash.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here's hoping that Dex/Wis/Con has something like Skilled (I can't see it having Savage Attacker). </p><p></p><p>And I'm not expecting to see many nobles; I think it's Str/Int/Cha. But I doubt that will be enough to put everyone off because they want to play a <em>noble</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 9410500, member: 87792"] And I'm not sure why you think that it's bizarre. I think one of my players reached sixteen pages of background. That [I]was[/I] an 18 year old. How old do you think someone needed to be to be a squire? Or a monk in the middle ages? (14 in both cases generally). We're not all the sons of nobles - but most of us have a past and do multiple things. This is because to me it looks as if you are reaching and contorting to try desperately to find some sort of moral claim rather than just admitting to disliking the mechanics. But as you keep bringing it up (despite the politics) [I]there would be classism if the stats weren't spread around. [/I]Is there anything saying all nobles are smart? No. Is there anything saying that people from the streets can't be smart? Not that I'm aware of. Is there something [I]in the real world[/I] saying that sons of the wealthy get better teachers leading to better book learning and better grades? Yes. (Do I need to dig up university entrance stats?) The closest to classism here is that there is an acknowledgement that your background shapes your opportunities. And that nobles tend to be better fed and those who care about it (not all do, hence not hard coding stats) tend to have better opportunities to learn academic things. And I'd say that the only way to deny this is to claim that everyone actually does have equality of opportunity and it is the fault of poor people that they are poor. And [I]that[/I] is classist. The only secondary stats that are a near total waste for any characters are Cha and Int. Wis might be in third place but legitimately has about a quarter of all saving throws, two passive skills, and a good skill range. I'd say the only skill that truly matters here is Perception. And if they have done what I [I]think[/I] then the Str/Dex/Con background will be the one that goes with the Medium Armour + Shield proficiency (at least it won't offer Int or Cha), making it an interesting choice for arcane casters - and the Int/Wis/Cha one with Magic Initiate that can spruce up fighters. I don't think there will be 4-6 backgrounds; I think it's more likely there will be about four for each class. And four or five backgrounds just dropped in the trash. Here's hoping that Dex/Wis/Con has something like Skilled (I can't see it having Savage Attacker). And I'm not expecting to see many nobles; I think it's Str/Int/Cha. But I doubt that will be enough to put everyone off because they want to play a [I]noble[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D species article
Top