Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Studio Blog - Sage Advice - Creature Evolutions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8416829" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>The thing all of us people here on ENWorld have to remember is that these changes <em>aren't for us</em>.</p><p></p><p>We can and do anything we want. If we don't like something, we will change it. If something in 5E is different than how it was in a previous edition that we prefered, we can just swap back the old version instead of using the new. If we already own the original 5E books... we can just use those instead of the Revised ones. None of these changes to these new books should impact any of us whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>The only people for who these changes impact are the people who are reading these Revised books for the first time. Because they are going to learn the game using those books and how WotC wishes to present the game to the public (with all of the cultural changes / mores / emphasis that go along with it.) If they want to make the change that orcs are not default Chaotic Evil (excluding one tiny passage in the front part of the MM that most people probably have never read, especially if you were a player)... and instead make it clear that Orcs in the MM and more especially Orc PCs do not have that alignment by default anymore and can easily be any alignment whatsoever, then they will print it that way so that those who are not beholden to the history of the game (like we are) can see it more representative of how society now sees things regarding race. Because those of us who ARE beholden to the history of the game or who just have our own ideas of how we think things should be based on our own experiences with D&D... can and will play the game any which way we wish <em>regardless</em> of what the books say.</p><p></p><p>We know that, and WotC knows that. And since since the defining trait of 5E is "Rulings, Not Rules"... WotC has no problems not making the game a RAW requirement for every single player out there. They WANT us to change rules we don't like. So even if you are one of those people who just has that mental lock that says "I HAVE to play RAW!"... they aren't making the game for you anymore. And you either learn to live with the changes to RAW, or you find a different game whose RAW you agree with 100%.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8416829, member: 7006"] The thing all of us people here on ENWorld have to remember is that these changes [I]aren't for us[/I]. We can and do anything we want. If we don't like something, we will change it. If something in 5E is different than how it was in a previous edition that we prefered, we can just swap back the old version instead of using the new. If we already own the original 5E books... we can just use those instead of the Revised ones. None of these changes to these new books should impact any of us whatsoever. The only people for who these changes impact are the people who are reading these Revised books for the first time. Because they are going to learn the game using those books and how WotC wishes to present the game to the public (with all of the cultural changes / mores / emphasis that go along with it.) If they want to make the change that orcs are not default Chaotic Evil (excluding one tiny passage in the front part of the MM that most people probably have never read, especially if you were a player)... and instead make it clear that Orcs in the MM and more especially Orc PCs do not have that alignment by default anymore and can easily be any alignment whatsoever, then they will print it that way so that those who are not beholden to the history of the game (like we are) can see it more representative of how society now sees things regarding race. Because those of us who ARE beholden to the history of the game or who just have our own ideas of how we think things should be based on our own experiences with D&D... can and will play the game any which way we wish [I]regardless[/I] of what the books say. We know that, and WotC knows that. And since since the defining trait of 5E is "Rulings, Not Rules"... WotC has no problems not making the game a RAW requirement for every single player out there. They WANT us to change rules we don't like. So even if you are one of those people who just has that mental lock that says "I HAVE to play RAW!"... they aren't making the game for you anymore. And you either learn to live with the changes to RAW, or you find a different game whose RAW you agree with 100%. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Studio Blog - Sage Advice - Creature Evolutions
Top