Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 9192918" data-attributes="member: 86653">I'd suggest you watch a lot more then because Jackie Chan's trademark is improvised weapons. The brawler subclass's trademark is improvised weapons. But sure, whatever.Except that it can be dismissed as a bad choice. Clearly it's causing confusion.Yep. Watch almost any Jackie Chan movie and you'll see him do exactly that about a thousand times.Martial arts is more than kung fu. There are non-Asian martial arts. Monks are not the only martial arts masters in D&amp;D. And they're not even the only ones who can fight unarmed.Jackie Chan movies are a whole lot more than the Drunken Master archetype. Watch basically anything else by him and you'll see him using improvised weapons in all kinds of bizarre and absurd situations to beat rooms full of opponents. It's literally his trademark style.Yes. What Jackie Chan does in most of his films is a different archetype than the Drunken Master. Well spotted. Trouble is, it's all the rest of his films you should look at. The ones where improvised weapons are his bread and butter.Try this clip as one example from his ~150 films that aren't Drunken Master.[MEDIA=youtube]TEcQwq4pUz0[/MEDIA]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 9192918, member: 86653"] I'd suggest you watch a lot more then because Jackie Chan's trademark is improvised weapons. The brawler subclass's trademark is improvised weapons. But sure, whatever. Except that it can be dismissed as a bad choice. Clearly it's causing confusion. Yep. Watch almost any Jackie Chan movie and you'll see him do exactly that about a thousand times. Martial arts is more than kung fu. There are non-Asian martial arts. Monks are not the only martial arts masters in D&D. And they're not even the only ones who can fight unarmed. Jackie Chan movies are a whole lot more than the Drunken Master archetype. Watch basically anything else by him and you'll see him using improvised weapons in all kinds of bizarre and absurd situations to beat rooms full of opponents. It's literally his trademark style. Yes. What Jackie Chan does in most of his films is a different archetype than the Drunken Master. Well spotted. Trouble is, it's all the rest of his films you should look at. The ones where improvised weapons are his bread and butter. Try this clip as one example from his ~150 films that aren't Drunken Master. [MEDIA=youtube]TEcQwq4pUz0[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]

Verification