Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D without resource management
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8858252" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>I think you could still keep hit points (or wounds, if you'd rather), since tracking health in some manner is pretty much in <em>every </em>RPG out there, which suggests that there may not be a better (or at least easier) method to do it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think something like this would require far fewer spells, but each spell given multiple options for each "point" of magical energy spent on them. It's probably easiest to imagine with harmful spells, since the more points, the greater the damage and/or larger the effect.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps something like this (<em>totally </em>making stuff up here with no thought behind it; I'm sure it's full of holes):</p><p></p><p>Spells still have levels, but the levels determine how much Power is needed to cast the spell. This may mean that there are more than 9 spell levels.</p><p></p><p>A spellcaster can automatically spend an amount of Power on their turn dependent on their level. For the moment, I'll say it's equal to their half their proficiency bonus. So a 1st level wizard has two Power and can cast a 1st-level spell using their action.</p><p></p><p>In order to gain Power, the caster needs to make a check of some sort. Maybe's its a spellcasting ability check, maybe it's Arcana or another appropriate skill, depending on class. On a success, they gain Power. Maybe it's equal to half their PB again, maybe it's a d4 or other die. Maybe the die you roll goes up as you increase in level. On a failure, you either gain no Power, lose Power, or have a failure of some sort. </p><p></p><p>You can then (same turn) decide if you're going to cast the spell or continue to hold it and try to accrue more power next turn.</p><p></p><p>Casting the spell may <em>also </em>involve some sort of check.</p><p></p><p>Possible complication 1: if you lose concentration on your spell while accruing power or fail to cast it, this could cause dangerous or disastrous results. This is to discourage spellcasters from spending a minute or ten gathering energy and letting loose a ginormous <em>fireball </em>to toast the entire adventure location.</p><p></p><p>Possible complication 2: You can only accrue Power for a few rounds before you have to cast the spell. The number of rounds is dependent on your level. A low-level wizard simply wouldn't be able to get enough energy to get a ginormous <em>fireball.</em></p><p></p><p>Possible complication 3: Each round you accrue Power, you have to spend 1 hit point.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This one I'm less sure of. It's great for high-power fantasy but less for more traditional fantasy. In that case, maneuvers and the like are useful. This <em>could </em>be combined with a "Power accrue" thing to allow for fancier maneuvers, but it might be easier to give fighters a certain number of points (or dice) each turn and fighters can choose to spend these points of maneuvers or increasing damage, to-hit rolls, movement, AC, or even saving throws.</p><p></p><p>I don't know if this is very D&D, but it could potentially be interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8858252, member: 6915329"] I think you could still keep hit points (or wounds, if you'd rather), since tracking health in some manner is pretty much in [I]every [/I]RPG out there, which suggests that there may not be a better (or at least easier) method to do it. I think something like this would require far fewer spells, but each spell given multiple options for each "point" of magical energy spent on them. It's probably easiest to imagine with harmful spells, since the more points, the greater the damage and/or larger the effect. Perhaps something like this ([I]totally [/I]making stuff up here with no thought behind it; I'm sure it's full of holes): Spells still have levels, but the levels determine how much Power is needed to cast the spell. This may mean that there are more than 9 spell levels. A spellcaster can automatically spend an amount of Power on their turn dependent on their level. For the moment, I'll say it's equal to their half their proficiency bonus. So a 1st level wizard has two Power and can cast a 1st-level spell using their action. In order to gain Power, the caster needs to make a check of some sort. Maybe's its a spellcasting ability check, maybe it's Arcana or another appropriate skill, depending on class. On a success, they gain Power. Maybe it's equal to half their PB again, maybe it's a d4 or other die. Maybe the die you roll goes up as you increase in level. On a failure, you either gain no Power, lose Power, or have a failure of some sort. You can then (same turn) decide if you're going to cast the spell or continue to hold it and try to accrue more power next turn. Casting the spell may [I]also [/I]involve some sort of check. Possible complication 1: if you lose concentration on your spell while accruing power or fail to cast it, this could cause dangerous or disastrous results. This is to discourage spellcasters from spending a minute or ten gathering energy and letting loose a ginormous [I]fireball [/I]to toast the entire adventure location. Possible complication 2: You can only accrue Power for a few rounds before you have to cast the spell. The number of rounds is dependent on your level. A low-level wizard simply wouldn't be able to get enough energy to get a ginormous [I]fireball.[/I] Possible complication 3: Each round you accrue Power, you have to spend 1 hit point. This one I'm less sure of. It's great for high-power fantasy but less for more traditional fantasy. In that case, maneuvers and the like are useful. This [I]could [/I]be combined with a "Power accrue" thing to allow for fancier maneuvers, but it might be easier to give fighters a certain number of points (or dice) each turn and fighters can choose to spend these points of maneuvers or increasing damage, to-hit rolls, movement, AC, or even saving throws. I don't know if this is very D&D, but it could potentially be interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D without resource management
Top