Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9857194" data-attributes="member: 93670">Your ignoring the point on why it's a failure to support GMs and didn't even bother to expound even a single detail on why I could be good...  so I'll make one up for you.   I'm so tired of that attitude from 5e hardcover module railroad connectors who can't even imagine other styles of campaign but are certain they are enthusiastically engaged in 5e's OneTrueWay of play.  The problem is not that I couldn't come up with something when a player does that... The problem is that I very much could and because I run sandboxy games , that thing would go somewhere that would need an eventual retcon.A simple sidebar saying that the gm should be aware there are plans for these many monoliths involving [a sentence or two of plan breadcrumbs] in a future adventure dedicated to their purpose is plenty for a sandbox gm to allow players to investigate a little but know that it's a dead end of potential retcon for now until they encounter another monolith with additional details down the line</blockquote>