Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 9282995" data-attributes="member: 205">I think that's the sticking point (and maybe a bit of a sematic issue).  If something is designed to perfectly meet its goals, but those goals are "broad acceptance and marketability", rather than "be the best X possible", does that mean its design is good?Like you said above, you (and presumably all of us) can recognize features of the Porsche that obviously exceed that of the Ford F-150; it's why you used it in your example.  If we're not complimenting the design of the Porsche in comparison to the F-150, what metric are we recognizing as being better?</blockquote>