Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JoeGKushner" data-source="post: 2043562" data-attributes="member: 1129">Well, for someone who didn't want to debate it, you sure put a lot of explanation into it.WoTC, from what I understand, had license to do one book. They did. Chaosium never followed up with new products. Pulp Cthulhu is over two, maybe three years late. Saying Cthulhu d20 failed because there are no new books for it is an inacurrate statement as there never were going to be any new, WoTC books, for it.Saying Chaosium failed to support it on the other hand, is an apt statement. Many Chaosium fans do indeed prefer the BRP version but the d20 version brought in many new people who'd never bothered with CoC in the first place.And as far as being dead... well it's been alive in several of my games. Heck, there are still people playing OD&amp;D. So no, I disagree with you here. It didn't fail as it was a one-shot deal. Chaosium failed to support it. BIG difference.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JoeGKushner, post: 2043562, member: 1129"] Well, for someone who didn't want to debate it, you sure put a lot of explanation into it. WoTC, from what I understand, had license to do one book. They did. Chaosium never followed up with new products. Pulp Cthulhu is over two, maybe three years late. Saying Cthulhu d20 failed because there are no new books for it is an inacurrate statement as there never were going to be any new, WoTC books, for it. Saying Chaosium failed to support it on the other hand, is an apt statement. Many Chaosium fans do indeed prefer the BRP version but the d20 version brought in many new people who'd never bothered with CoC in the first place. And as far as being dead... well it's been alive in several of my games. Heck, there are still people playing OD&D. So no, I disagree with you here. It didn't fail as it was a one-shot deal. Chaosium failed to support it. BIG difference. [/QUOTE]

Verification