Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 Blackmoor - Worth buying?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jester47" data-source="post: 1748831" data-attributes="member: 2238"><p>I disagree. As psion pointed out we have the Scarred Lands as an example. </p><p> </p><p>If I have never cracked a Blackmoor book before, and really don't know much about its technology shtick how would that be the part I wanted? If I was new to Blackmoor (as I am) I would not expect high tech stuff. So IMO it is not a tease and I don't feel cheated. </p><p> </p><p>just as this noob has. </p><p></p><p>But its not. The main book is neato-mosquito IMO.</p><p></p><p>I never said it was incomplete. I was trying to convey that they could have added some hightech stuff if they wanted to and it would not have hurt much. I think you find it incomplete because it did not meet your expectation. Which is ok. For you, a major part of blackmoor was the stuff in the Temple of the Frog and City of the Gods supplements. I have never read these but have read the back-copy at the TSR Archive, and so I am making the assumption that lasers and e-swords only showed up in supplemental material in the DA line. But the thing is, if blackmoor had never been published and this was the first you saw of it, and you did not know about the high tech, would it seem incomplete?</p><p></p><p>And when is it not a ploy to sell future books? Everything in d20 is a ploy to sell more books IMO. Even Necromancer Games. Though they just use an older ploy. (that is adventures, but they are a lot less ployish than some others) </p><p></p><p>But what was blackmoor like before the alien tech showed up? I mean really, its more effective to leave out the tech at first and then add it in later in a supplement. This is because there is a whole history of the world without the tech that is a legit campaign setting. Would you rather have twelve pages of how stuff changed or 40? With a supplement you get 40 (or however many they decide to use). I think wor;d shattering changes should not get shoehorned into a book but rather have those changes given justice in a supplement. The more I have this conversation, the more I believe that Dave and Zeitgeist are making the right decision. The hardcore fans get more tech stuff with a supp than if it was crammed into the main setting book. </p><p></p><p>I think they can do much more justice to that social consequnce in a supplement entitled "city of the gods" followed by a book that covered "the way it used to be" than they could ever do by forcing it into one book. </p><p></p><p>6 is pretty frikken low. And I applaud them for only giving us 6. They could have done 10 or 12. But the 6 they gave us seem quite relavent to the setting. I think the ones in the core books plus these 6 give a good choice of options. Yeah we don't need em, but for a blackmoor campaign I find them nice to have. The thing is most people that play D&D want bog-standard. With the tech in a supplement if you (like me) want another bog-standard setting (but its an old setting really... so its not really ANOTHER) you can have it. If you want Blackmoor with laserbeems attached to its head, you can get that too. And considering that it goes well with the Wilderlands, it makes it one less setting... </p><p></p><p>Aaron.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jester47, post: 1748831, member: 2238"] I disagree. As psion pointed out we have the Scarred Lands as an example. If I have never cracked a Blackmoor book before, and really don't know much about its technology shtick how would that be the part I wanted? If I was new to Blackmoor (as I am) I would not expect high tech stuff. So IMO it is not a tease and I don't feel cheated. just as this noob has. But its not. The main book is neato-mosquito IMO. I never said it was incomplete. I was trying to convey that they could have added some hightech stuff if they wanted to and it would not have hurt much. I think you find it incomplete because it did not meet your expectation. Which is ok. For you, a major part of blackmoor was the stuff in the Temple of the Frog and City of the Gods supplements. I have never read these but have read the back-copy at the TSR Archive, and so I am making the assumption that lasers and e-swords only showed up in supplemental material in the DA line. But the thing is, if blackmoor had never been published and this was the first you saw of it, and you did not know about the high tech, would it seem incomplete? And when is it not a ploy to sell future books? Everything in d20 is a ploy to sell more books IMO. Even Necromancer Games. Though they just use an older ploy. (that is adventures, but they are a lot less ployish than some others) But what was blackmoor like before the alien tech showed up? I mean really, its more effective to leave out the tech at first and then add it in later in a supplement. This is because there is a whole history of the world without the tech that is a legit campaign setting. Would you rather have twelve pages of how stuff changed or 40? With a supplement you get 40 (or however many they decide to use). I think wor;d shattering changes should not get shoehorned into a book but rather have those changes given justice in a supplement. The more I have this conversation, the more I believe that Dave and Zeitgeist are making the right decision. The hardcore fans get more tech stuff with a supp than if it was crammed into the main setting book. I think they can do much more justice to that social consequnce in a supplement entitled "city of the gods" followed by a book that covered "the way it used to be" than they could ever do by forcing it into one book. 6 is pretty frikken low. And I applaud them for only giving us 6. They could have done 10 or 12. But the 6 they gave us seem quite relavent to the setting. I think the ones in the core books plus these 6 give a good choice of options. Yeah we don't need em, but for a blackmoor campaign I find them nice to have. The thing is most people that play D&D want bog-standard. With the tech in a supplement if you (like me) want another bog-standard setting (but its an old setting really... so its not really ANOTHER) you can have it. If you want Blackmoor with laserbeems attached to its head, you can get that too. And considering that it goes well with the Wilderlands, it makes it one less setting... Aaron. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 Blackmoor - Worth buying?
Top