Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 Future and Hard SF - some random thoughts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DarkKestral" data-source="post: 3145029" data-attributes="member: 40100"><p>Yeah, they're the same. You feel heavy, and feel like being pressed down away from the direction of travel. Basically, high G acceleration feels like being on a high-grav planet, because gravity causes acceleration, and our unit of gravitational strength stems from the measurement of that acceleration. Mind you, it's not hard to have high-C travel with low G acceleration. Ion drives can do that pretty effectively, and you'll be up to a few tenths of C within a few years, and keep accelerating until halfway through the trip. This means that for long trips, you can actually get to .99 C or better speeds, assuming you can keep the ship together at that kind of speed, since any impact will prove to be significant at that speed.</p><p></p><p>This actually makes starfighters somewhat reasonable, as starfighters wouldn't be used on 'ships of the line' but rather as point-defense units for planets, space stations, and the like against pirates and groups who can't or don't want to destroy their targets by long-distance bombardment.</p><p></p><p>Thus, they might be designed for in-atmosphere work and as interceptor vessels designed for short bursts of high-G acceleration in order to get past larger ships for the sake of police work, providing a defense against close-range bombardment, or creating a blockade, since ion drives need a lot of maneuvering room to get up to speed.</p><p></p><p>Long-distance, however, would still be the choice of fleets who don't care about enemy casualties or who are actively hunting down vessels.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, this is not all THAT different from today: ICBMs are available, but militaries don't often use them in territorial conflicts because they are likely to create a 'scorched earth' situation which effectively ruins territory for both sides. Fighters and bombers are now used for the purposes of point attack on targets, blockading enemy states, and to as a defense for larger ships which may be vulnerable to attack from fast-attack vessels or weapons systems with a long range. Cruise missiles, while an upgrade in some respects from fighters, are useful when you want a larger attack, but not the all-out destruction of the type ICBMs are associated with. Carriers carry cruise missiles and fighters because they help provide protection from close-in aerial/ground-based retaliation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DarkKestral, post: 3145029, member: 40100"] Yeah, they're the same. You feel heavy, and feel like being pressed down away from the direction of travel. Basically, high G acceleration feels like being on a high-grav planet, because gravity causes acceleration, and our unit of gravitational strength stems from the measurement of that acceleration. Mind you, it's not hard to have high-C travel with low G acceleration. Ion drives can do that pretty effectively, and you'll be up to a few tenths of C within a few years, and keep accelerating until halfway through the trip. This means that for long trips, you can actually get to .99 C or better speeds, assuming you can keep the ship together at that kind of speed, since any impact will prove to be significant at that speed. This actually makes starfighters somewhat reasonable, as starfighters wouldn't be used on 'ships of the line' but rather as point-defense units for planets, space stations, and the like against pirates and groups who can't or don't want to destroy their targets by long-distance bombardment. Thus, they might be designed for in-atmosphere work and as interceptor vessels designed for short bursts of high-G acceleration in order to get past larger ships for the sake of police work, providing a defense against close-range bombardment, or creating a blockade, since ion drives need a lot of maneuvering room to get up to speed. Long-distance, however, would still be the choice of fleets who don't care about enemy casualties or who are actively hunting down vessels. Mind you, this is not all THAT different from today: ICBMs are available, but militaries don't often use them in territorial conflicts because they are likely to create a 'scorched earth' situation which effectively ruins territory for both sides. Fighters and bombers are now used for the purposes of point attack on targets, blockading enemy states, and to as a defense for larger ships which may be vulnerable to attack from fast-attack vessels or weapons systems with a long range. Cruise missiles, while an upgrade in some respects from fighters, are useful when you want a larger attack, but not the all-out destruction of the type ICBMs are associated with. Carriers carry cruise missiles and fighters because they help provide protection from close-in aerial/ground-based retaliation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 Future and Hard SF - some random thoughts
Top