Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 License Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sabby" data-source="post: 747617" data-attributes="member: 5522"><p>I'm sure one of you has a quick answer to this. (I'm also sure that if I would have spent "just a little more time" looking that I could have found an easier answer, but I still haven't found a definitive answer.) </p><p></p><p>Is there anyone who knows for sure what view WotC takes towards "recommending" their products? I would like to, in a small campaign setting that I want to "half-heartedly" publish, recommend usage of certain books from WotC that will work well with the setting. I would love to go into more detail, perhaps say, "This feat and this feat are appropriate, but this feat is not." Keep in mind, I do not want to detail what the feats do. I just wish to make up a small appendix that says, "These other works from Wizards are good, you should buy them. These pieces will be useful."</p><p></p><p>I can understand their desire to protect their IP and respect it. I just hope that there's a bit of leeway when it comes to me recommending the purchase of that material... but I fear that I cannot even allude to the existence of other Wizards products.</p><p></p><p>Also, how careful do I need to be about making feats which are similar to other WotC feats? If I wanted to present a feat which was "Additional Favored Class" which granted a race another favored class, do I have to be concerned that WotC made a feat which granted an additional favored class but restricted the choice to an arcane casting class? How about an even grayer shade, where I make a feat which gave +2 to Spot and +2 to Listen, but also granted +2 to Craft (Origami Pterodactyls)... which would otherwise duplicate Alertness, but had another benefit.</p><p></p><p>What I'm most interested in is making up a background book which will let me publish my home campaign. I don't anticipate selling more than ten copies or so, so it's probably not going to even register on the WotC radar. I may never even finish the book... But, it's a philosophical question on my part. "How rigid are the rules which guide me?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sabby, post: 747617, member: 5522"] I'm sure one of you has a quick answer to this. (I'm also sure that if I would have spent "just a little more time" looking that I could have found an easier answer, but I still haven't found a definitive answer.) Is there anyone who knows for sure what view WotC takes towards "recommending" their products? I would like to, in a small campaign setting that I want to "half-heartedly" publish, recommend usage of certain books from WotC that will work well with the setting. I would love to go into more detail, perhaps say, "This feat and this feat are appropriate, but this feat is not." Keep in mind, I do not want to detail what the feats do. I just wish to make up a small appendix that says, "These other works from Wizards are good, you should buy them. These pieces will be useful." I can understand their desire to protect their IP and respect it. I just hope that there's a bit of leeway when it comes to me recommending the purchase of that material... but I fear that I cannot even allude to the existence of other Wizards products. Also, how careful do I need to be about making feats which are similar to other WotC feats? If I wanted to present a feat which was "Additional Favored Class" which granted a race another favored class, do I have to be concerned that WotC made a feat which granted an additional favored class but restricted the choice to an arcane casting class? How about an even grayer shade, where I make a feat which gave +2 to Spot and +2 to Listen, but also granted +2 to Craft (Origami Pterodactyls)... which would otherwise duplicate Alertness, but had another benefit. What I'm most interested in is making up a background book which will let me publish my home campaign. I don't anticipate selling more than ten copies or so, so it's probably not going to even register on the WotC radar. I may never even finish the book... But, it's a philosophical question on my part. "How rigid are the rules which guide me?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
d20 License Questions
Top