Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranger REG" data-source="post: 501921" data-attributes="member: 533">I really do not understand your argument against Spycraft, Mistwell. All of us knew that this game requires any one of Wizards' core rulebook. So it's a given, that d20 Modern will more than likely appear next to Spycraft at the tabletop gaming session. This is what Wizards trying to capitalize on.Everyone knew that in order for it to become a d20-based product, they have to have a 5% minimum Open Game Content. Having looked at the Spycraft book, the designers have been more than generous. A competent game designer can read the license page to determine which he can and cannot use, should he decided to use any of the OGC for his own product. AEG doesn't have to make the extra step to provide an electronic SRD for Spycraft. The book itself contains OGC alongside with Product Identity. (It was smart of Wizards to include that in the drafting of the license.)The only sticking point right now is the VP/WP system. Without this being Open, it's hard to create stats for a product that can be compatible to the Spycraft rules. That is why I keep bugging the Wizards folks to make that damn thing Open.</blockquote>