Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 506139" data-attributes="member: 2525">We are going to have to agree to disagree.  I think business folk in many gaming companies (perhaps you are one of the business people at AEG, I don't know, so I won't include AEG itself) would also disagree with some of the things you have said.  I know that you throw those words "due diligence" around like it is a water pistol, when us attorneys know that's a nuclear device you are so casually batting around.  I also know the negotiation process to obtain the license to use the Trademark Spycraft on your product is more than passing a kidding-porn test, nor is it a few hours of chat.Perhaps you know something I don't, but my understanding is that nobody was forced to recall any books - just told to fix things in future versions.  I could be wrong on that.Again, I think we just need to agree to disagree.  I think third party publishers view publishing a Spycraft game as more difficult than publishing a d20M game, whether than is a faulty perception or not, and that ultimately that will damage AEG.  You obviously disagree, and I hope you are right (since I like Spycraft).</blockquote>