Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 298277" data-attributes="member: 2205">a)&nbsp; I kinda like the class scheme.&nbsp; The idea in Spycraft of coming from a certain &quot;department&quot; seems ultimately less flexible.&nbsp; I'm undecided on the HP issue: but then again, I'm not really one of those guys that really has a problem with HP except at high level.b)&nbsp; That's not what I mean.&nbsp; Sure, you can add magic and psionics, but you still get an almost super-heroic James Bond type of game, without muddling around in lots of other aspects.&nbsp; Still, neither of these are truly concerning to me, because I'm a born tinkerer.&nbsp; I'll house rule away stuff I don't like.&nbsp; The real issue is:c) Third party or not, it will be supported.&nbsp; Others will be making stuff that's compatible with d20 Modern.&nbsp; Can the same thing be said for Spycraft?&nbsp; Unless d20 Modern totally flops somehow, it's going to be the d20 standard for doing modern games.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 298277, member: 2205"] [color=white] a) I kinda like the class scheme. The idea in [i]Spycraft[/i] of coming from a certain "department" seems ultimately less flexible. I'm undecided on the HP issue: but then again, I'm not really one of those guys that really has a problem with HP except at high level. b) That's not what I mean. Sure, you can add magic and psionics, but you still get an almost super-heroic James Bond type of game, without muddling around in lots of other aspects. Still, neither of these are truly concerning to me, because I'm a born tinkerer. I'll house rule away stuff I don't like. The real issue is: c) Third party or not, it will be supported. Others will be making stuff that's compatible with [i]d20 Modern.[/i] Can the same thing be said for [i]Spycraft[/i]? Unless [i]d20 Modern[/i] totally flops somehow, it's going to be the d20 standard for doing modern games. [/color] [/QUOTE]

Verification