Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jmucchiello" data-source="post: 851181" data-attributes="member: 813">A far bettter tool would be a list of OGC references. Need rules for ship-to-ship combat? Go to these sources. Need rules for new kind of magic item? Try out the xxx in book yyy or the zzz in book aaa, etc.I wouldn't want to see a collected OGC work because it would start the lawsuits flying. All those publishers with weak and vague OGC declarations would hit the publisher of the all OGC book with so many lawsuits over what is or isn't OGC that it just could not be worth the trouble to include those publishers' material. Thus only the clear designators of OGC would get included and only they would be hurt by such a resource.So which would you rather have? Companies that are good at declaring OGC and very open with it turning into companies that are stingier and more vague? Or the current system? If you think this would be a change for the better, then go ahead and gather that OGC. And when I see you email address on the sales page for my titles I'll know when they've reached the end of their sales.</blockquote>