Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vigilance" data-source="post: 2073612" data-attributes="member: 4275">I agree, adventures in core rulebooks always seemed silly to me, even though a lot of folks seem to like that (and they are good for getting a feel for a setting no doubt).I was more speaking to comments Shaman made about the majority of classes being geared to FX.In one sense I feel his pain. Heck Im the guy who doesn't even use the Vancian magic system when he does FANTASY, and it has certainly never appeared in any of my d20 Modern stuff.But, WOTC knows its audience, and that audience clearly likes a distinctly Forgotten Realms aroma in its products. So Im not surprised that they spent so many of the 96 pages in d20 Past on FX-friendly settings, nor am I surprised that so many of the new classes are FX-oriented. So, I feel Shaman's pain, but Im not surprised <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Chuck</blockquote>