Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jester47" data-source="post: 380478" data-attributes="member: 2238">Actually Doc, I see it this way.If someone is willing to get a bunch of peope that agree with him in the opinion that a module is the greatest thing since sliced bread (which is apparently how he and his friends feel about RttToEE) or that it is really really horrible and bad and should be stricken from the record (which is the way I feel about bluffside's layout and printing standards: ILLEGIBLE!) then he has every right to post a review and give it a 5 to boost the score.  If he did not feel that way then why would he do it?  So he is a monte cook fan, if all the monte cook fans gave thier opinion of the module, they would easily bump that thing up over a four. I think its a great module and I would give it a five, as I consider it a masterpiece.  Heck I would not be mad at him if his review consisted of "we played it, we had lots of fun, and you should buy it."  He is telling me what he thinks.  While it is not the most valuable information, it is still useful to me in the respect that the reviewer likes it enough to take the time to post his opinion.  Another way to look at it is there are three people who before did not express thier opinion but decided to when they realised that the number did not reflect the input of thier opinions.  Its kind of like 5000 democrats in florida realizing that they should have actually gone to the polls in the last presidential election.  The only differnce here is that the polls are always open.  And now that it has been brought to my attention that RttToEE has slipped below 4.0 I think it is time for me to write a review of it and help get it above 4.0Aaron.</blockquote>

Verification