Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Daggerheart Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tigris" data-source="post: 9893091" data-attributes="member: 7043270"><p>You do not minimize GM moves with fear. You predefine the possible GM moves with fear per scene as described in my play report.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The GM made 2 really spectacular moves with the fear, but they were part of a story and thus made sense and integrated well. They were nowhere mandatory though, so I am sure for other scenes there could also have been some cool potential GM moves (prepared but not used).</p><p></p><p></p><p>In the end most people just overestimate themselves and think things they do themselves are better than they are (like in homecooking...) having a premade (ideally by a professional) adventure and story is normally just better than spontaneous improvisation by non professionals if you look at it from am objective point of view.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also you lose nothing by providing such adventurs. You just broaden your potential audience. People who dont like to prepare can still do chaotic improvisation sessions and just not use it, the same way not use premade adventurs in D&D.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In the end such premade adventurs help new GMs immensly (and also can helo bad GMs if they dont overestimate themselves) and can make it also easier for players to know what to expect. Its a lot easier as a player to know what to expect when someone runs curse of strad than when someone runs some homebrew.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The best experiences I had with one shots where always preprepared adventurs with good well prepared GMs. And the worst where always improvised.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And even with not so good GMs running not so good systems and not so good premade adventurs, the one shots where at least ok. (5e one shots...) . Where with mostly improvisation the floor is just infinitely low.</p><p></p><p></p><p>EDIT: Also thank you about giving me the opportunity about the podcast, but I dont listen to podcast and I find it extremly boring watching or listening to other people play RPGs. I also really hate impro theater, becaus for me it feels like a waste of time to watch something not prepared as well as possible. A movie in comparison is made to be as good as possible in every second.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Edit 2: I just looked it up, and I found no rule in daggerheart where players can spend hope to influence the story. I just found reddit threats where people want to include this possibility as homebrew. <a href="https://daggerheart.org/core-mechanics/making-moves-taking-action" target="_blank">https://daggerheart.org/core-mechanics/making-moves-taking-action</a> players can only spend hope on 4 things according to this page.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tigris, post: 9893091, member: 7043270"] You do not minimize GM moves with fear. You predefine the possible GM moves with fear per scene as described in my play report. The GM made 2 really spectacular moves with the fear, but they were part of a story and thus made sense and integrated well. They were nowhere mandatory though, so I am sure for other scenes there could also have been some cool potential GM moves (prepared but not used). In the end most people just overestimate themselves and think things they do themselves are better than they are (like in homecooking...) having a premade (ideally by a professional) adventure and story is normally just better than spontaneous improvisation by non professionals if you look at it from am objective point of view. Also you lose nothing by providing such adventurs. You just broaden your potential audience. People who dont like to prepare can still do chaotic improvisation sessions and just not use it, the same way not use premade adventurs in D&D. In the end such premade adventurs help new GMs immensly (and also can helo bad GMs if they dont overestimate themselves) and can make it also easier for players to know what to expect. Its a lot easier as a player to know what to expect when someone runs curse of strad than when someone runs some homebrew. The best experiences I had with one shots where always preprepared adventurs with good well prepared GMs. And the worst where always improvised. And even with not so good GMs running not so good systems and not so good premade adventurs, the one shots where at least ok. (5e one shots...) . Where with mostly improvisation the floor is just infinitely low. EDIT: Also thank you about giving me the opportunity about the podcast, but I dont listen to podcast and I find it extremly boring watching or listening to other people play RPGs. I also really hate impro theater, becaus for me it feels like a waste of time to watch something not prepared as well as possible. A movie in comparison is made to be as good as possible in every second. Edit 2: I just looked it up, and I found no rule in daggerheart where players can spend hope to influence the story. I just found reddit threats where people want to include this possibility as homebrew. [URL]https://daggerheart.org/core-mechanics/making-moves-taking-action[/URL] players can only spend hope on 4 things according to this page. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Daggerheart Discussion
Top