Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 9831946" data-attributes="member: 5142">Your language is a bit stronger than need be, Imaro. I don't think that insinuating that people's brains are somehow damaged by D&D is particularly respectful. Nor do I think that there is a "demand of instant improv" with Daggerheart. You can just ask the players some easy questions framed as soft pitches. You can also throw out ideas to help them generate things too.Emphasis mine. This is hardly a "demand" for instant improv, though I suppose it's easier to argue against the assumption of a much more hardline opinion than what is actually present in the book. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging    :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> Following this it says that some groups may want to take this further with world details, but that hardly makes it a demand. This is pretty on-par with common practices in D&D. "You landed the killing blow. How did you kill this skeleton?"</blockquote>