Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Damage Equivalence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5798343" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>Just shooting from the hip with little information about the actual target.....</p><p></p><p></p><p>My gut reaction was quite negative.</p><p>After two minutes of thinking I started coming up with ways to like it.</p><p></p><p>It makes me think of CR.</p><p>I long ago gave up having a high level of faith in CR. The science of consistently assigning CRs under stable circumstances is complex enough that even if you think you have a handle on it, you can't blindly trust that the guy who wrote the book you are holding does. And then you add in the variations on circumstance.</p><p></p><p>But the practical reality is that if you trust it more as an art and you are willing to take ownership of your game then it ends up working as a really nice little tool despite the voodoo foundation. </p><p>I think this methodology could work the same for spells. </p><p>There will be errors. And there will be places where people just really disagree on some value calls. But it has the potential to cut through a lot of issues and get to "more than good enough" in an efficient manner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5798343, member: 957"] Just shooting from the hip with little information about the actual target..... My gut reaction was quite negative. After two minutes of thinking I started coming up with ways to like it. It makes me think of CR. I long ago gave up having a high level of faith in CR. The science of consistently assigning CRs under stable circumstances is complex enough that even if you think you have a handle on it, you can't blindly trust that the guy who wrote the book you are holding does. And then you add in the variations on circumstance. But the practical reality is that if you trust it more as an art and you are willing to take ownership of your game then it ends up working as a really nice little tool despite the voodoo foundation. I think this methodology could work the same for spells. There will be errors. And there will be places where people just really disagree on some value calls. But it has the potential to cut through a lot of issues and get to "more than good enough" in an efficient manner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Damage Equivalence
Top