Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CovertOps" data-source="post: 5225158" data-attributes="member: 65152">On a total side note I have to say the thing that pisses me off most about this is that they have taken a PHB rule and re-written it.  [soapbox]This doesn't bother me so much as I'm happy with most of the errata so far, but the presentation of said changes in a brand new book (PHB3) instead of actual errata to the original rule forcing us to "buy" rules updates is outrageous in the extreme.[/soapbox]If this was actual "new" content/rules then so be it.  You could live without said new rule as it obviously applied to something in the new book itself (for example the class that has only at-will powers).  Having to check multiple different books/sources is poor organization (I know for sure that we have PHB, PHB3, MM, MM2, MM3) unless of course the definition is just presented for convience and should be ignored as not rules text.</blockquote>