Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Damage on a Miss: Because otherwise Armour Class makes no sense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6271793" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Yup. I made that same observation awhile back when these threads sprouted up. It didn't get much traction. I assume this goes back to how people read rules texts; the "natural language" versus "gamist jargon" issue. I've never read concepts such as Saving Throw, Hit, Miss, AC as something that characters in the fiction would ever reference: "Man...Bob, that was a great Saving Throw you did to stave off that petrification effect. Good work. Keep it up."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By my way of seeing it, if you're going for a deeper grade of process simulation then it makes much more sense than the current model. The percentage of martial exchanges where something is lost which makes it more likely that you'll fail on the next martial exchange is the overwhelming majority. Any outlier to that is miniscule. Even if its just aggregate fatigue, DoaM models martial exchanges well (especially frenzied martial exchanges). 13th Age does a good job with this as only 5 % of exchanges ablate nothing.</p><p></p><p>I wonder if DoaM didn't ocurr on a natural 1 if folks would move away from "full revolt" mode.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6271793, member: 6696971"] Yup. I made that same observation awhile back when these threads sprouted up. It didn't get much traction. I assume this goes back to how people read rules texts; the "natural language" versus "gamist jargon" issue. I've never read concepts such as Saving Throw, Hit, Miss, AC as something that characters in the fiction would ever reference: "Man...Bob, that was a great Saving Throw you did to stave off that petrification effect. Good work. Keep it up." By my way of seeing it, if you're going for a deeper grade of process simulation then it makes much more sense than the current model. The percentage of martial exchanges where something is lost which makes it more likely that you'll fail on the next martial exchange is the overwhelming majority. Any outlier to that is miniscule. Even if its just aggregate fatigue, DoaM models martial exchanges well (especially frenzied martial exchanges). 13th Age does a good job with this as only 5 % of exchanges ablate nothing. I wonder if DoaM didn't ocurr on a natural 1 if folks would move away from "full revolt" mode. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Damage on a Miss: Because otherwise Armour Class makes no sense
Top