Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Damage on a Miss: Because otherwise Armour Class makes no sense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6461924" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>This is all in-fiction. But we are not interested in the imaginary tension experienced by the imaginary characters in the imaginary gameworld. We are interested in the real tension experienced by the real people in the real world, sitting around a kitchen table playing the game.</p><p></p><p>For them, swords aren't particularly more prevalent than attack spells - as best I'm aware, wizards and fighters are the two most popular classes in the game, and have been for most of its history. And I wouldn't be surprised if wizards are more popular than great weapon fighters (though that is pure intuition, resting on the fact that GWF means forgoing the shield, which is one of the fighter's class specialties).</p><p></p><p>In 4e, the at-will magic missile was changed from requiring an attack roll to auto-damage, mostly (as best I can tell) because the customer base wanted it to be auto-damage as it had been for the previous few decades.</p><p></p><p>In both 3E and 4e, a wizard could use an auto-damage effect bascially every round of combat. Likewise in AD&D from around 5th level, by which point, between spells and wands, the MU would generally have enough spells to cast one every round.</p><p></p><p>The meaningufl decision point for the player of a magic-user isn't whether or not to deal damage, it's which spell to use (based on considerations of degree of damage, number of targets, risk of friendly fire, etc). The comparable decision point for a fighter is which target to attack. The prospect of missing rather than hitting - ie of dealing no damage - is, in my view, no more fundamental to the latter than the former.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6461924, member: 42582"] This is all in-fiction. But we are not interested in the imaginary tension experienced by the imaginary characters in the imaginary gameworld. We are interested in the real tension experienced by the real people in the real world, sitting around a kitchen table playing the game. For them, swords aren't particularly more prevalent than attack spells - as best I'm aware, wizards and fighters are the two most popular classes in the game, and have been for most of its history. And I wouldn't be surprised if wizards are more popular than great weapon fighters (though that is pure intuition, resting on the fact that GWF means forgoing the shield, which is one of the fighter's class specialties). In 4e, the at-will magic missile was changed from requiring an attack roll to auto-damage, mostly (as best I can tell) because the customer base wanted it to be auto-damage as it had been for the previous few decades. In both 3E and 4e, a wizard could use an auto-damage effect bascially every round of combat. Likewise in AD&D from around 5th level, by which point, between spells and wands, the MU would generally have enough spells to cast one every round. The meaningufl decision point for the player of a magic-user isn't whether or not to deal damage, it's which spell to use (based on considerations of degree of damage, number of targets, risk of friendly fire, etc). The comparable decision point for a fighter is which target to attack. The prospect of missing rather than hitting - ie of dealing no damage - is, in my view, no more fundamental to the latter than the former. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Damage on a Miss: Because otherwise Armour Class makes no sense
Top