Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
damage reduction for armor?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archon of Light" data-source="post: 1636743" data-attributes="member: 20967"><p>A few interesting points presented here...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed. But it is understood that the mechanics of the Core Rules represent the simplest system of arbitration for combat. Therefore, any deviations to this system are most likely expanding the base model and thereby increasing the complexity at the cost of efficiency. In simpler terms, every variation of the existing rules are going to bog the game down. It is simply a matter of discerning how much of it you are willing to tolerate for the sake of a greater level of complexity.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>The damage resistance mechanic in itself is flawed, as it is presented in the Core Rules. By their definition, damage that is inflicted simply disappears or is entirely absorbed by the skin/armor/magic/whatever without any side effects or consequences. If damage represents physical energy created by the force of a blow, then the energy 'resisted' must be turned away or redirected in some manner. Energy is never destroyed. That is just a law of physics. It may be acceptable in game terms that energy is simply dissipated, but it's not very realistic. </p><p></p><p>Now, because I wanted to utilize a variant of the Vitality and Wound points system, I found a way to get around this in a more believable manner without sacrificing much of the efficiency in game play. First, I tweaked the current system to have Vitality represent a character's physical energy and stamina. As they lose Vitality points, the character eventually becomes more fatigued. When he loses all his Vitality points, he is too exhausted to defend himself effectively and all damage thereafter reduces Wound points unless he can recover his Vitality again. Characters could also reduce Vitality through strenuous physical exertion, such as moving in heavy armor or while encumbered, or attempting to cast spells beyond their ability or power.</p><p></p><p>Before, damage could only reduce hit points and nothing more. But with this variant in place, damage resistance now has the capability of converting that damage (energy) into a different form. So the dual-wielding kukri expert may not physically damage the armor-plated fighter right away, but his attacks will wear him down to a point when he can. And the plate-wearing warrior may exhaust himself quicker while trying to fend off the quicker and lighter assailant who will not wear himself out as fast. At least, that is what I hope this system will achieve once it is completed.</p><p></p><p>And, yes, it will add an extra layer or two of complexity to combat. But my style of play supports it. I've never agreed with the ideology of people who run about from room to room in a monster-infested subterranean complex fighting numerous times within a short period of time and never tiring. The only true 'rest' in the game was fashioned as a recharge period to regain spells and abilities otherwise limited from one sunrise to the next. A handful of threatening skirmishes in a day is far more exciting to me than a series of repetitious encounters with often predictable outcomes. Certainly more entertaining to watch players pace themselves than to try charging ahead to the next encounter before their spells wear off.</p><p></p><p>But, I digress as I have rambled on once more. Variants will add complexity to the game, and may bog it down some. Everyone simply has to decide how much it is worth to them and their fellow players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archon of Light, post: 1636743, member: 20967"] A few interesting points presented here... Indeed. But it is understood that the mechanics of the Core Rules represent the simplest system of arbitration for combat. Therefore, any deviations to this system are most likely expanding the base model and thereby increasing the complexity at the cost of efficiency. In simpler terms, every variation of the existing rules are going to bog the game down. It is simply a matter of discerning how much of it you are willing to tolerate for the sake of a greater level of complexity. The damage resistance mechanic in itself is flawed, as it is presented in the Core Rules. By their definition, damage that is inflicted simply disappears or is entirely absorbed by the skin/armor/magic/whatever without any side effects or consequences. If damage represents physical energy created by the force of a blow, then the energy 'resisted' must be turned away or redirected in some manner. Energy is never destroyed. That is just a law of physics. It may be acceptable in game terms that energy is simply dissipated, but it's not very realistic. Now, because I wanted to utilize a variant of the Vitality and Wound points system, I found a way to get around this in a more believable manner without sacrificing much of the efficiency in game play. First, I tweaked the current system to have Vitality represent a character's physical energy and stamina. As they lose Vitality points, the character eventually becomes more fatigued. When he loses all his Vitality points, he is too exhausted to defend himself effectively and all damage thereafter reduces Wound points unless he can recover his Vitality again. Characters could also reduce Vitality through strenuous physical exertion, such as moving in heavy armor or while encumbered, or attempting to cast spells beyond their ability or power. Before, damage could only reduce hit points and nothing more. But with this variant in place, damage resistance now has the capability of converting that damage (energy) into a different form. So the dual-wielding kukri expert may not physically damage the armor-plated fighter right away, but his attacks will wear him down to a point when he can. And the plate-wearing warrior may exhaust himself quicker while trying to fend off the quicker and lighter assailant who will not wear himself out as fast. At least, that is what I hope this system will achieve once it is completed. And, yes, it will add an extra layer or two of complexity to combat. But my style of play supports it. I've never agreed with the ideology of people who run about from room to room in a monster-infested subterranean complex fighting numerous times within a short period of time and never tiring. The only true 'rest' in the game was fashioned as a recharge period to regain spells and abilities otherwise limited from one sunrise to the next. A handful of threatening skirmishes in a day is far more exciting to me than a series of repetitious encounters with often predictable outcomes. Certainly more entertaining to watch players pace themselves than to try charging ahead to the next encounter before their spells wear off. But, I digress as I have rambled on once more. Variants will add complexity to the game, and may bog it down some. Everyone simply has to decide how much it is worth to them and their fellow players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
damage reduction for armor?
Top