Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Damage Reduction vs. Two Weapon Fighting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 1340017" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>Not so. Stat out the costs:</p><p></p><p>At low levels:</p><p>+1 greatsword: 2350</p><p>+1 longsword and masterwork (attack and defense) light shield: 2760 or so.</p><p></p><p>At mid levels:</p><p>+1 holy greatsword: 18,350gp</p><p>+1 flaming shortsword and +2 defense/+1 bane offense heavy shield: 20,467gp or so.</p><p></p><p>At high levels:</p><p>+5 flaming burst bane greatsword: 128,350</p><p>+4 returning frost light hammer and +5 defense, +2 (offense) defending heavy shield of shock: 129, 770 or so.</p><p></p><p>Two weapons of slightly lower enhancement plus a shield come out to only slightly (at nearly all levels, a negligable amount) than the THF weapon.</p><p></p><p>If we try to get the high level THF an animated shield to equalize any AC advantage (a rather cheesy IMO enhancement to begin with and one that won't be universally available; although it must be taken into account for such comparisons, it is not clear to me that "this equipment gives a THF an advantage" is a deciding factor in the comparison--especially when we refuse to consider the same factor (can anyone say two bane shortswords of wounding or paired sunblades?) in favor of TWF), the numbers work out like this:</p><p></p><p>At mid levels:</p><p>+1 holy greatsword and +2 heavy animated shield: 34,507gp</p><p>+1 Axiomatic shortsword and +2 defense/+1 bane offense heavy shield: 30,767gp or so.</p><p></p><p>At high levels:</p><p>+5 flaming burst bane greatsword and +5 animated heavy shield: 177,507</p><p>+5 Anarchic light pick and +5 defense, +3 (offense) defending heavy shield of shock: 173,700 and change</p><p></p><p>The cost of an animated shield that equals the AC of the TWF (shield) fighter (Assuming that the shield fighter doesn't use the defending ability on his weapon), allows the TWF to equalize the primary weapon enhancements or make very significant upgrades to his off-hand weapon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, your argument only points out that THF types can take steps to equalize a disadvantage here. And your argument about +6 items being cheap, like the assumption that the THF will have an animated shield, assumes high levels. +6 items aren't cheap for characters at levels 1-10.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nonsense. They don't both wear the same armor because different armors offer different advantages. (You previously argued that the THF equalizes his AC without increasing dex by wearing fullplate). If they both wear the same armor, the THF will have a lower AC. If they wear different armors, the THF will have less manueverability.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did you see the CR on that dinosaur? Any THF fighter that has four attacks per round who goes up against it ought to paste it by blinking. If he doesn't, something is wrong. However, I assure you that the issue is very different if you run an 8th level THF against the T-Rex.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. I'm saying that he's slightly less screwed--especially by monsters who swallow whole. And, while others point out that the monster can generally pin the round after it starts the grapple, one round of damage from the TWF will often make a big difference in the outcome of a battle.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just because something requires "specific builds" to get "real power" doesn't mean there's something wrong with it. That's true of nearly every option in D&D. Anyone can take an iconic half-orc barbarian but if you want to get the real power out of it, it'll take some specialized builds. Anyone can take an iconic elf archer and make it work but if you want to get the real power out of it, it'll take some specialized builds.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, anyone can take the iconic TWF types--the single classed ranger (incidentally, the single classed ranger using TWF against a favored enemy blows nearly every other fighter type out of the water in terms of damage/full attack--it's not even close), the paired weapon, or the double weapon fighter, or the dual wielding rogue and make a character who's good enough. However, to get the real power out of it you need some specialized builds.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, every example anyone has tossed out for the THF includes Power Attack so make that 3-1. And, if the THF goes for Close Quarters Fighting, it's 3-2. That's not too bad considering the power that you can get out of some of those specialized builds. What you seem to want to do is compare a maximized THF to a standard TWF. Instead, you should compare a maximized TWF to a maximized THF. (If you want animated shields for the THF, give wounding or vorpal weapons to the TWF, for instance).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 1340017, member: 3146"] Not so. Stat out the costs: At low levels: +1 greatsword: 2350 +1 longsword and masterwork (attack and defense) light shield: 2760 or so. At mid levels: +1 holy greatsword: 18,350gp +1 flaming shortsword and +2 defense/+1 bane offense heavy shield: 20,467gp or so. At high levels: +5 flaming burst bane greatsword: 128,350 +4 returning frost light hammer and +5 defense, +2 (offense) defending heavy shield of shock: 129, 770 or so. Two weapons of slightly lower enhancement plus a shield come out to only slightly (at nearly all levels, a negligable amount) than the THF weapon. If we try to get the high level THF an animated shield to equalize any AC advantage (a rather cheesy IMO enhancement to begin with and one that won't be universally available; although it must be taken into account for such comparisons, it is not clear to me that "this equipment gives a THF an advantage" is a deciding factor in the comparison--especially when we refuse to consider the same factor (can anyone say two bane shortswords of wounding or paired sunblades?) in favor of TWF), the numbers work out like this: At mid levels: +1 holy greatsword and +2 heavy animated shield: 34,507gp +1 Axiomatic shortsword and +2 defense/+1 bane offense heavy shield: 30,767gp or so. At high levels: +5 flaming burst bane greatsword and +5 animated heavy shield: 177,507 +5 Anarchic light pick and +5 defense, +3 (offense) defending heavy shield of shock: 173,700 and change The cost of an animated shield that equals the AC of the TWF (shield) fighter (Assuming that the shield fighter doesn't use the defending ability on his weapon), allows the TWF to equalize the primary weapon enhancements or make very significant upgrades to his off-hand weapon. Again, your argument only points out that THF types can take steps to equalize a disadvantage here. And your argument about +6 items being cheap, like the assumption that the THF will have an animated shield, assumes high levels. +6 items aren't cheap for characters at levels 1-10. Nonsense. They don't both wear the same armor because different armors offer different advantages. (You previously argued that the THF equalizes his AC without increasing dex by wearing fullplate). If they both wear the same armor, the THF will have a lower AC. If they wear different armors, the THF will have less manueverability. Did you see the CR on that dinosaur? Any THF fighter that has four attacks per round who goes up against it ought to paste it by blinking. If he doesn't, something is wrong. However, I assure you that the issue is very different if you run an 8th level THF against the T-Rex. Nope. I'm saying that he's slightly less screwed--especially by monsters who swallow whole. And, while others point out that the monster can generally pin the round after it starts the grapple, one round of damage from the TWF will often make a big difference in the outcome of a battle. Just because something requires "specific builds" to get "real power" doesn't mean there's something wrong with it. That's true of nearly every option in D&D. Anyone can take an iconic half-orc barbarian but if you want to get the real power out of it, it'll take some specialized builds. Anyone can take an iconic elf archer and make it work but if you want to get the real power out of it, it'll take some specialized builds. Similarly, anyone can take the iconic TWF types--the single classed ranger (incidentally, the single classed ranger using TWF against a favored enemy blows nearly every other fighter type out of the water in terms of damage/full attack--it's not even close), the paired weapon, or the double weapon fighter, or the dual wielding rogue and make a character who's good enough. However, to get the real power out of it you need some specialized builds. Well, every example anyone has tossed out for the THF includes Power Attack so make that 3-1. And, if the THF goes for Close Quarters Fighting, it's 3-2. That's not too bad considering the power that you can get out of some of those specialized builds. What you seem to want to do is compare a maximized THF to a standard TWF. Instead, you should compare a maximized TWF to a maximized THF. (If you want animated shields for the THF, give wounding or vorpal weapons to the TWF, for instance). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Damage Reduction vs. Two Weapon Fighting
Top