Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aco175" data-source="post: 9491050" data-attributes="member: 27385">I could be in favor of this.&nbsp; It seems to add a bit more to tracking of things, but not much to make the rule not worth using.&nbsp; I would likely just tell the players that you need to deal more than 10 damage to get through and damage this monster.&nbsp; The other problem would be multiple attacks.&nbsp; I take one action to attack twice and does each attack need to clear the 10 points of just the total of the action.&nbsp; I can see where this favors some over others.&nbsp; What about something like the cleave property?&nbsp; What determines if I hit the monster?&nbsp; Do I need to do damage to use cleave, or do I still hit and can use cleave if I do no damage.&nbsp; Stuff like this.Back to the dragon example, how many peasants would stay and fight a dragon?&nbsp; How many make the frightful presence save?&nbsp; How they all make the initiative or most are dead from the breath weapon.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aco175, post: 9491050, member: 27385"] I could be in favor of this. It seems to add a bit more to tracking of things, but not much to make the rule not worth using. I would likely just tell the players that you need to deal more than 10 damage to get through and damage this monster. The other problem would be multiple attacks. I take one action to attack twice and does each attack need to clear the 10 points of just the total of the action. I can see where this favors some over others. What about something like the cleave property? What determines if I hit the monster? Do I need to do damage to use cleave, or do I still hit and can use cleave if I do no damage. Stuff like this. Back to the dragon example, how many peasants would stay and fight a dragon? How many make the frightful presence save? How they all make the initiative or most are dead from the breath weapon. [/QUOTE]

Verification