Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 1619152" data-attributes="member: 5777">So a +5 weapon minimum (50k gp) and a standard action to get in maybe 16 attacks, each with roughly 5% chance to hit for base damage +1?Lets say it is a two handed sword.. 2d6 base, +1 = avg of 8.8*0.05*16=6.4 damage.At the levels we are talking here I dont think that giving up even that one attack is worth that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Making it much larger in pluses really starts cutting into that wealth per level chart..I am not sure what it should be priced at.. but +4 seems a bit over the top for what it does.Edit: I know 5% for each swing is a bit low, there will probably be a bit more of a chance for the first swing, but even if we multiply the damage by say 5 it still isnt impressive for a +4 enhancement.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scion, post: 1619152, member: 5777"] So a +5 weapon minimum (50k gp) and a standard action to get in maybe 16 attacks, each with roughly 5% chance to hit for base damage +1? Lets say it is a two handed sword.. 2d6 base, +1 = avg of 8. 8*0.05*16=6.4 damage. At the levels we are talking here I dont think that giving up even that one attack is worth that ;) Making it much larger in pluses really starts cutting into that wealth per level chart.. I am not sure what it should be priced at.. but +4 seems a bit over the top for what it does. Edit: I know 5% for each swing is a bit low, there will probably be a bit more of a chance for the first swing, but even if we multiply the damage by say 5 it still isnt impressive for a +4 enhancement. [/QUOTE]

Verification