Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="King of Old School" data-source="post: 1438853" data-attributes="member: 8789">Mixed bag.&nbsp; On one hand, I love D20 Modern and intensely dislike Spycraft's &quot;collectible rules&quot; product design, so seeing anything go from D20M to SC feels like losing one to the &quot;bad guys&quot; when D20M could desperately use all the setting product it can get.&nbsp; Also, I thought DI had a huge amount of unrealized potential in its first incarnation.&nbsp; OTOH, a second edition would allow the setting to realize some of that potential and iron out some of the (considerable) bugs, plus it seems that they are very comfortable with Spycraft as a rules engine.&nbsp; The new DI could be fantastic, and add value to my SC purchase.&nbsp; Also, the death of SFA means that my major bugaboo with SC is dead and gone.On a totally incidental note, the cover for DI2e rocks -- a big improvement on the first edition cover and, I think, more likely to grab attention on the shelves.KoOS</blockquote>

[QUOTE="King of Old School, post: 1438853, member: 8789"] Mixed bag. On one hand, I love D20 Modern and intensely dislike Spycraft's "collectible rules" product design, so seeing anything go from D20M to SC feels like losing one to the "bad guys" when D20M could desperately use all the setting product it can get. Also, I thought DI had a huge amount of unrealized potential in its first incarnation. OTOH, a second edition would allow the setting to realize some of that potential and iron out some of the (considerable) bugs, plus it seems that they are very comfortable with Spycraft as a rules engine. The new DI could be fantastic, and add value to my SC purchase. Also, the death of SFA means that my major bugaboo with SC is dead and gone. On a totally incidental note, the cover for DI2e [i]rocks[/i] -- a big improvement on the first edition cover and, I think, more likely to grab attention on the shelves. KoOS [/QUOTE]

Verification