Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Donovan Morningfire" data-source="post: 3696407" data-attributes="member: 39532">I think that was the intent of the SECR game designers from the word go, and fits with how we see the Jedi act in the movies, where it seems intent is more relevant than the power itself.&nbsp; Force Thrust in and of itself is fairly innocous, but Force Thrust on a guy at the edge of a 100 meter cliff to knock them over is far more likely to garner a DSP than Force Thrust on a guy in the middle of a warehouse being shoved into a packing crate, even if both of them were shooting at you at the time.Using the Force becuase it's more convienent when other options are readily available is starting down the path of the dark side.&nbsp; Kinda like using D&amp;D fireball spell to swat a fly.Obi-Wan had no issue breaking out the Jedi Mind Whammy against the stormtroopers on Tatooine to avoid capture or the stormtroopers on the Death Star to avoid detection.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Donovan Morningfire, post: 3696407, member: 39532"] I think that was the intent of the SECR game designers from the word go, and fits with how we see the Jedi act in the movies, where it seems intent is more relevant than the power itself. Force Thrust in and of itself is fairly innocous, but Force Thrust on a guy at the edge of a 100 meter cliff to knock them over is far more likely to garner a DSP than Force Thrust on a guy in the middle of a warehouse being shoved into a packing crate, even if both of them were shooting at you at the time. Using the Force becuase it's more convienent when other options are readily available is starting down the path of the dark side. Kinda like using D&D fireball spell to swat a fly. Obi-Wan had no issue breaking out the Jedi Mind Whammy against the stormtroopers on Tatooine to avoid capture or the stormtroopers on the Death Star to avoid detection. [/QUOTE]

Verification